Bug#911626: [Pkg-emacsen-addons] Bug#911626: Explicit dependency on elpa-s

2018-11-02 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Fri 02 Nov 2018 at 01:51PM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote: > Hmmm, by the way... Maybe it's a good idea to always add versioned > depends (like >=) on other elpa-packages automatically by dh_elpa? Like > if during a given build there is, say 1.0-1 of elpa-foo dependency is > available in uns

Bug#911626: Explicit dependency on elpa-s

2018-11-02 Thread David Bremner
Lev Lamberov writes: > Чт 01 ноя 2018 @ 14:51 David Bremner : > >> - add versioned depends on elpa-f to force it to upgrade to buster first > > Hmmm, by the way... Maybe it's a good idea to always add versioned > depends (like >=) on other elpa-packages automatically by dh_elpa? Like > if during

Bug#911626: Explicit dependency on elpa-s

2018-11-02 Thread Lev Lamberov
Чт 01 ноя 2018 @ 14:51 David Bremner : > - add versioned depends on elpa-f to force it to upgrade to buster first Hmmm, by the way... Maybe it's a good idea to always add versioned depends (like >=) on other elpa-packages automatically by dh_elpa? Like if during a given build there is, say 1.0-1

Bug#911626: Explicit dependency on elpa-s

2018-11-01 Thread David Bremner
Lev Lamberov writes: > Sorry, for delay with my answer. > >> I'm not sure I see the whole picture yet, but I guess that >> >> 1) elpa-f in stretch depends on s-el (instead of elpa-s) >> 2) elpa-vimish-fold in buster is a new style dh_elpa using package >> that only looks at elpa pa

Bug#911626: Explicit dependency on elpa-s

2018-11-01 Thread Lev Lamberov
Sorry, for delay with my answer. > I'm not sure I see the whole picture yet, but I guess that > > 1) elpa-f in stretch depends on s-el (instead of elpa-s) > 2) elpa-vimish-fold in buster is a new style dh_elpa using package > that only looks at elpa packages for depends. > > Maybe