Hello, On Fri 02 Nov 2018 at 01:51PM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> Hmmm, by the way... Maybe it's a good idea to always add versioned > depends (like >=) on other elpa-packages automatically by dh_elpa? Like > if during a given build there is, say 1.0-1 of elpa-foo dependency is > available in unstable, then the resulting package will depend on > elpa-foo (>= 1.0-1). ISTM that this would be semantically incorrect. We should specify the dependency bounds needed to run the package. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
