On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:17:44 -0800 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
> > On 2017-09-28 12:37:38, Jack Bates wrote:
> >
> > Any reason why this hasn't been applied to the package just yet?
> >
> > I'd be happy to do that in a NMU if there are no objections...
>
> Please don't. A
On 2020-11-17 15:17:44, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2017-09-28 12:37:38, Jack Bates wrote:
>
>>> I think the following will resolve this, by running the diff-highlight
>>> Makefile when the package is built (following the pattern in
>>> debian/rules for other contrib thing
Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2017-09-28 12:37:38, Jack Bates wrote:
>> I think the following will resolve this, by running the diff-highlight
>> Makefile when the package is built (following the pattern in
>> debian/rules for other contrib things):
>>
>>> diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
>>
On 2017-09-28 12:37:38, Jack Bates wrote:
> tags 868871 patch
> thanks
>
> I have the same request -- I had been using:
>
>> git config --global pager.log 'perl
>> /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/diff-highlight/diff-highlight | less'
>
> That way my diff-highlight script was always up to date.
>
> I j
tags 868871 patch
thanks
I have the same request -- I had been using:
git config --global pager.log 'perl /usr/share/doc/git/contrib/diff-highlight/diff-highlight | less'
That way my diff-highlight script was always up to date.
I just APT-updated and it stopped working (since diff-highlight
5 matches
Mail list logo
