Bug#865624: (no subject)

2019-01-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:27 PM wrote: > Might I ask to have this fix backported to Debian stable (Stretch)? > > Currently the issue completely breaks certain Transmission usage > scenarios on Debian stable branch. > > At best, the fix it is applied directly within the "stretch" branch, > otherwi

Bug#865624: (no subject)

2019-01-17 Thread sch0rsch
Might I ask to have this fix backported to Debian stable (Stretch)? Currently the issue completely breaks certain Transmission usage scenarios on Debian stable branch. At best, the fix it is applied directly within the "stretch" branch, otherwise "stretch-backports". Thanks in advance, Mich

Bug#865624: Confirm upstream "fix" works

2018-05-06 Thread Andrey Gursky
Dear Pandada8, dear Maintainers, after apply such change to package source and rebuild, ram consumption drop from 800MB+ to 40MB. please, do not forget to preserve credits for the original workaround description [1]. It took me much time for experiments in order to get to this simple workaro

Bug#865624: Applying the patch

2018-02-28 Thread Michael Lowe
Can someone please tell me how to apply this patch and build it without having to install qt5?

Bug#865624: Can we merge this ?

2018-02-05 Thread Pandada8
>From upstream issue[1], there is a lot confirmation of such a replacement (libcurl4-gnutls-dev -> libcurl4-openssl-dev ) result in much low and constant memory consumption. though there's not a real _FIX_. the former patch do works as a temporary workaround. I hope this patch can be merged, and we

Bug#865624: Confirm upstream "fix" works

2017-12-07 Thread Pandada8
diff --git a/transmission-2.92/debian/control b/../transmission-2.92/debian/control index 91f8b5f..06ac9da 100644 --- a/transmission-2.92/debian/control +++ b/../transmission-2.92/debian/control @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Build-Depends: autotools-dev, dh-autoreconf, dh-systemd

Bug#865624: transmission-daemon: reportbug

2017-10-29 Thread shodan
oon. Best regards, Bas "shodan" On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 12:00:20 -0400 messyidea wrote: > Package: transmission-daemon > Version: 2.92-2 > Followup-For: Bug #865624 > > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 9.0 > APT prefers stable-updates > APT po

Bug#865624: transmission-daemon: reportbug

2017-06-25 Thread messyidea
Package: transmission-daemon Version: 2.92-2 Followup-For: Bug #865624 -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CP

Bug#865624: transmission-daemon 2.9.2 high memory usage

2017-06-25 Thread Sandro Tosi
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/transmission/transmission/issues/313 On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Mingchao Yao wrote: > I simply copyed the old version transmission-daemon from debian8 (other > computer) to debian9 > > (to ensure this could work, I have also copyed some .so files), b

Bug#865624:

2017-06-23 Thread Mingchao Yao
I am sorry for some misspells before. Now I have build a staticlly linked transmission-daemon (version 2.92), it works ok (occupied about 20mb with about 30 torrents). I have also seen some issues at github. ( https://github.com/transmission/transmission/issues/313 ) So I am think it it a bug of d

Bug#865624: transmission-daemon 2.9.2 high memory usage

2017-06-23 Thread Mingchao Yao
Package: transmission-daemon Version: 2.9.2 I have upgraded debian8 to debian9 today, and I find transmission-daemon have a high memory usage now. At debian 8, it occupied about 100mb memory, but at debian9 it cooupied about 800mb. I simply copyed the old version transmission-daemon from debian8