On 28/01/17 20:42, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> then I don't understand your first email.
Do I need to clarify more or did my follow-up mail already do that?
> So I have currently no clue where the timestamps with *.0 are
> coming from.
Maybe I'm nitpicking, maybe I'm pointing out somethin
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 05:45:30PM +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Hello Carsten,
>
> On 28/01/17 17:15, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> > we didn't ever have done some patching here. I did a quick search on the
> > upstream sources and found mozilla bug 1277976 which introduces this
> > chang
Hello Carsten,
On 28/01/17 17:15, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> we didn't ever have done some patching here. I did a quick search on the
> upstream sources and found mozilla bug 1277976 which introduces this
> change.
While this sure is the change that made the mtime problem manifest with
user-visib
Helo Peter,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:52:14PM +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote:
...
> I suggest these synthetic, fake mtimes should be fixed to reflect actual
> changes. I can't believe that someone wrote the two versions of
> menuOverlay.dtd with two different access keys in the same, very first
> se
Package: lightning
Version: 1:45.6.0-3
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
Some packaged files have fake, constant modification times, as can for
instance be seen here:
ll --full-time usr/lib/lightning/
total 40
-rw-r--r-- 1 peter peter 563 2010-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 app.ini
drwxr-xr-x 2
5 matches
Mail list logo
