Bug#837199: transition: armadillo

2016-09-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 13/09/16 20:12, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/13/2016 07:51 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 10/09/16 11:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse dependencies shoul

Bug#837199: transition: armadillo

2016-09-13 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/13/2016 07:51 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 10/09/16 11:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: >>> armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse >>> dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and >>>

Bug#837199: transition: armadillo

2016-09-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 10/09/16 11:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: >> armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse >> dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and >> will test it in the next couple of days. > > Because gdal n

Bug#837199: transition: armadillo

2016-09-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse > dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and > will test it in the next couple of days. Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unbloc

Bug#837199: transition: armadillo

2016-09-09 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and will test it in the next couple