On 13/09/16 20:12, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/13/2016 07:51 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 10/09/16 11:35, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 09/10/2016 02:11 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: >>>> armadillo has already been uploaded to unstable. While the reverse >>>> dependencies should build with a binNMU, I have not tested them and >>>> will test it in the next couple of days. >>> >>> Because gdal needs to be rebuilt for the armadillo transition to unblock >>> the vtk6 rebuild for the openmpi transition, I've also done a round of >>> rebuilds to assess the impact. >>> >>> Fortunately the number of reverse dependencies for armadillo is limited, >>> and all packages rebuilt successfully: >>> >>> gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) OK >>> gnss-sdr (0.0.8-1) OK >>> mlpack (2.0.2-1) OK >>> seer (1.1.1-2) OK >>> >>> pktools (2.6.7-2) OK >>> >>> I'd like to have gdal (2.1.1+dfsg-4) migrate to testing to get the two >>> RC bugfixes into stretch, before binNMUs for the armadillo rdeps are >>> scheduled. >> >> I scheduled everything but gdal. Let's see if gdal migrates tonight once >> perl is >> old enough. > > Thanks for waiting with the gdal binNMU, I appreciate that a lot. > > I really hope having perl migrate will be sufficient, the gdal situation > in testing has caused several RC bugs and a thread on -devel :-(
It just went in. I have now nmu'ed it for the armadillo transition. Cheers, Emilio
