On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 19:19 +0100, Christopher Hoskin wrote:
[...]
> > Given the fact that the package has no reverse-dependencies and before
> > your NMU in unstable had not been updated for two years, I wonder
> > whether removal might have been a better option.
>
> That's a fair point - but pre
Package: release.debian.org
Tags: jessie
Followup-For: Bug #836571
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
> *No*. The bug you're fixing may be critical, the request to fix it in
> stable is at most normal.
Appologies - my misunderstanding.
> Given the fact that the package has
Control: tags -1 +confirmed -patch +jessie
Control: severity -1 normal
On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 07:32 +0100, Christopher Hoskin wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: critical
*No*. The bug you're fixing may be critical, the request to fix it in
stable is at most normal.
> Tags: patch
> U
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
The attached patch fixes bug #817231 in the rabbitvcs package. This is
classified as a critical bug on the grounds that it can cause serious data loss
(e.g. loss of entire home fo
4 matches
Mail list logo
