Bug#823706: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#823706: Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Hi Paul, On Sun, 2019-10-20 at 18:51 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Abou, > On 19-10-2019 16:05, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > More analysis of the issue showed that we want the lpk file contain > > > > when the lazarus-src package is not installed, but we probably want to have > > > > when lazaru

Bug#823706: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Hi Abou, On 19-10-2019 16:05, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > More analysis of the issue showed that we want the lpk file contain  > > > > when the lazarus-src package is not installed, but we probably want to have > > > > when lazarus-src is installed. Ack. > So one solution is to package both

Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

More analysis of the issue showed that we want the lpk file contain when the lazarus-src package is not installed, but we probably want to havewhen lazarus-src is installed. So one solution is to package both file versions and used dpkg-divert to override lcl-units lpk files by those of lazarus-sr

Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 18:51:41 +0100 Abou Al Montacir wrote: > ... > > > Please note that *.lpk files should be included in binary packages not > > > in source one because they are mandatory for lazarus to resolve > > > dependencies and paths of ppu files as explained one by Mattias Gaertner. I see

Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Control: reassign -1 lazarus Hi All, I was looking into this bug and it seems somewhat more complex than I was thinking. It looks like Lazarus is now shipping much more components that are not compiled when building the IDE using the bigide make target. This means that those packages are not mea

Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Hi Denis, On 10-05-16 11:11, Denis Kozlov wrote: > Is there a reference (e.g. discussion on a mailing list, etc) which > identifies the quality requirements that Lazarus source files don't > meet? There is a chance that they could get addressed upstream. Well, the general reference for all Debian

Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Hi Paul, On 9 May 2016 at 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote: > Because the upstream sources don't meet the quality requirements of > Debian. So we need to massage the source into the right shape. > Unfortunately, apparently we made a mistake there. And I agree with Abou > that we should have a check on n

Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Hi Denis, On 09-05-16 18:05, Denis Kozlov wrote: > Instead, why not just take the official sources in full and as is? > https://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/Lazarus Zip _ > GZip/Lazarus 1.6/ > Be

Bug#823706: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Hi Abou, Thanks for looking into this issue. > I think this is severity normal and thus changing it. In my case an installation on a fresh system could not get rebuilt, so it felt like an 'important' severity, but please change it to whatever is more appropriate. Perhaps something else was going

Bug#823706: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Control: severity -1 normal thanks Hi Denis, On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 22:39 +0100, Denis Kozlov wrote: > Package: lazarus-1.6 > Version: 1.6+dfsg-2 > Severity: important Thank you reporting this problem. However I'm not sure I agree with the severity. I think this is severity normal and thus changi

Bug#823706: Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing

Package: lazarus-1.6 Version: 1.6+dfsg-2 Severity: important Many Lazarus 1.6 source files are missing from the package. This creates two major problems: 1) IDE cannot be rebuilt - which is required to install or remove components. 2) Many bundled components cannot be installed due to randomly