hi
On 2/9/19 7:25 PM, Birger Schacht wrote:
>>> There are new lintian warnings:
>>>
>>> I: sway: file-references-package-build-path usr/bin/sway
>>> [...]
>>> I think this refers to the occurrence of strings like:
>>> ../sway/commands/exec.c
>>> in the binaries. This is a relative path and the lin
Hello Birger,
On Tue 12 Feb 2019 at 07:56PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> I've now removed the sed line alltogether- I didn't find a solution
> without adding a patch that would have to be updated with every release.
> Maybe there is a way to override the project_version with meson command
> line
Hi,
On 2/12/19 6:40 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Birger,
>
> On Mon 11 Feb 2019 at 07:36PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
>
>> sway 1.0-rc2 was released today, i've updated the package and pushed to
>> salsa.
>>
>> Changes:
>> * New upstream version
>> * d/rules: use sed to set upstream versi
Hello Birger,
On Mon 11 Feb 2019 at 07:36PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> sway 1.0-rc2 was released today, i've updated the package and pushed to
> salsa.
>
> Changes:
> * New upstream version
> * d/rules: use sed to set upstream version in meson.build
It looks like the clean target does not
Hi,
sway 1.0-rc2 was released today, i've updated the package and pushed to
salsa.
Changes:
* New upstream version
* d/rules: use sed to set upstream version in meson.build
cheers,
Birger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
On Sun 10 Feb 2019 at 09:51AM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> On 2/9/19 9:21 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Birger, could you add a comment in d/control, saying that the versioned
>> dependency is just a workaround to help users of Debian experimental
>> avoid a broken window manager, and in the
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:15:02PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I don't think we should allow problems with wlroots in experimental to
> block getting sway through NEW and into experimental, although we'd want
> to hold off moving sway to unstable until the wlroots situation is
> resolved. So, I s
Hi,
On 2/9/19 10:12 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 09:30:43PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> I'm thinking, it means 0.3-1 broke over 0.2-1, and that is a bug that
>> I'd be filing as serious if I found it myself.
>> Happy to properly check, since this is a simple library I sh
Hi,
On 2/9/19 9:21 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Birger, could you add a comment in d/control, saying that the versioned
> dependency is just a workaround to help users of Debian experimental
> avoid a broken window manager, and in the future it will be removed in
> favour of relying on dpkg-shlibdeps
Hello Berger, Mattia,
On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 09:30PM +01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> wlroots is only in experimental and is pre-1.0, however. So we probably
>> shouldn't demand proper transitions from its maintainers.
>
> This is not a
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 09:30:43PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I'm thinking, it means 0.3-1 broke over 0.2-1, and that is a bug that
> I'd be filing as serious if I found it myself.
> Happy to properly check, since this is a simple library I should find
> the time for this.
Looking, this looked
Hi,
On 2/9/19 8:55 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Birger,
>
> On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 07:25PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
>
* Make versioned run dependency on libwlroots0 explicit
>>>
>>> Please explain (either in the changelog or with a comment in d/control)
>>> why this is needed -- it's
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> wlroots is only in experimental and is pre-1.0, however. So we probably
> shouldn't demand proper transitions from its maintainers.
This is not about transitions though. It's about being sure wlroots
maintainer know what it means to
Hello,
On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 09:07PM +01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Then it's a bug in libwlroots, that did not bump shlibs when adding
> symbols, or it has a broken .symbols file.
> And it's a quite serious one at that, if it's really that, showcasing
> why maintaining shared libraries is not an e
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 12:55:50PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Birger,
>
> On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 07:25PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
>
> >>> * Make versioned run dependency on libwlroots0 explicit
> >>
> >> Please explain (either in the changelog or with a comment in d/control)
> >> why t
Hello Birger,
On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 07:25PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
>>> * Make versioned run dependency on libwlroots0 explicit
>>
>> Please explain (either in the changelog or with a comment in d/control)
>> why this is needed -- it's unusual not to be able to rely on
>> dpkg-shlibdeps doin
Hi,
thanks for the detailed review, that was very helpful!
On 2/9/19 6:50 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Changes since beta2:
>> * New upstream release
>> * Remove swaylock and swayidle: they are now separate packages
>> * Clean up d/sway.install
>
> "Cleaning up" suggests only deleting lines,
Hello Birger,
On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 01:42PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> i've updated the package to 1.0-rc1 and pushed to the git repo.
Thank you for working on this!
For my own reference: this e-mail reviews
edcdf846db12a6dc7495caea02bad2faa30586fb.
> Changes since beta2:
> * New upstream
hi,
On 2/6/19 1:09 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Birger,
>
> There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock
> into separate source packages.
>
> Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to
> prepare separate source packages for all these? We m
Hi,
On 2/7/19 5:36 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Birger,
>
> On Wed 06 Feb 2019 at 12:00PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
>
>> Forgot to cc the bugreport:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote:
>>> But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start
>>> with th
Hello Birger,
On Wed 06 Feb 2019 at 12:00PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> Forgot to cc the bugreport:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote:
>> But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start
>> with those.
>
> thats now #921496 and #921497.
You need to set Ma
Forgot to cc the bugreport:
Hi,
On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote:
> But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start
> with those.
thats now #921496 and #921497.
cheers,
Birger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi!
On 2/6/19 1:11 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 05:09PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
>> There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock
>> into separate source packages.
>>
>> Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to
Hello,
On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 05:09PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock
> into separate source packages.
>
> Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to
> prepare separate source packages for all these? We m
Hello Birger,
There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock
into separate source packages.
Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to
prepare separate source packages for all these? We might as well do it
now rather than later.
--
Sean Whitto
control: tag -1 +pending
Hello,
On Thu 31 Jan 2019 at 01:03PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
>> Could you `dch "Try upload again."; dch -r; git commit; git push`,
>> please? Then I can try again with a -3 upload.
> done!
Success! Thank you for your patience.
You should be able to see the result
Hi,
On 1/31/19 4:22 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: tag -1 -pending
>
> Hello Birger,
>
> On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 04:44PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
>> Pushed to DELAYED/14!
>
> *sigh*
>
> I have been fighting with Debian's upload queue for the past few hours
> because I discovered that the
control: tag -1 -pending
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 04:44PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Pushed to DELAYED/14!
*sigh*
I have been fighting with Debian's upload queue for the past few hours
because I discovered that the -2 upload was not processed.
I was able to get it processed through
control: tag -1 +pending
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 11:31PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> Argl, I'm sorry for having overlooked this
Well, me too :)
>> Could you make this change as a -2 upload, please? Since I have already
>> pushed the -1, it is cleaner to do it that way.
> Yes, fix
Hi,
On 1/30/19 10:46 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: tag -1 -pending
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 02:42PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
>> Thank you. I've pushed it to DELAYED/14, after which it will land in
>> the NEW queue.
>
> Er. After doing this, I immediately discovered this er
control: tag -1 -pending
Hello,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 02:42PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Thank you. I've pushed it to DELAYED/14, after which it will land in
> the NEW queue.
Er. After doing this, I immediately discovered this error in
d/copyright:
License: LGPL-2.1-or-later
should be
control: tag -1 +pending
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 09:13PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> done in 0d9ddb3b ;)
Thank you. I've pushed it to DELAYED/14, after which it will land in
the NEW queue.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 08:47PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> both fixed in ae7be33f. Thanks for your patience!
You need dch -r again ... sorry for the bureaucracy.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Sean,
On 1/30/19 9:10 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Birger,
>
> On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 08:47PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
>
>> both fixed in ae7be33f. Thanks for your patience!
>
> You need dch -r again ... sorry for the bureaucracy.
>
done in 0d9ddb3b ;)
cheers,
Birger
Hello Sean,
On 1/30/19 8:24 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Birger,
>
> On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 07:24AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I neglected to do a d/copyright check yesterday and have found
>> some problems with d/copyright that need to be fixed before I can
>> upload:
>>
>> - the
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 07:24AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Thanks. I neglected to do a d/copyright check yesterday and have found
> some problems with d/copyright that need to be fixed before I can
> upload:
>
> - the Source: field is wrong
>
> - the protocols/ dir needs accounting f
Hello Birger,
On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 12:07PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote:
>> Firstly, I want to ensure that Nicolas is adequately credited for having
>> done the majority of the packaging work (so far as I can tell); at the
>> time of writing, where master is at 9303b617, I don't think this is
>>
Hi,
On 1/30/19 2:33 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dear Birger, Nicolas,
>
> On Fri 11 Jan 2019 at 08:19AM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
>
>> I've sent nicoo another mail about this and i'll let you know as soon as
>> i hear back.
>
> Thank you to both of you for your recent work on the sway package.
Dear Birger, Nicolas,
On Fri 11 Jan 2019 at 08:19AM +01, Birger Schacht wrote:
> I've sent nicoo another mail about this and i'll let you know as soon as
> i hear back.
Thank you to both of you for your recent work on the sway package. I
want to unblock inclusion of swaywm in Debian by sponsori
Hi,
I see that there is now a swaywm-team on salsa for sway and wlroots.
Are you open to assistance with packaging for sway and associated
projects?
--
Regards,
Scott Leggett.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On 1/9/19 1:05 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Michele Cane [2018-12-14 19:32]:
>> Thanks for the work already done to bring this package to debian.
>>
>> Any update of a possible upload of b2 to experimental?
>
> Yes, please.
>
> Any update on this? Birger? nicoo?
I've sent nicoo anothe
* Michele Cane [2018-12-14 19:32]:
> Thanks for the work already done to bring this package to debian.
>
> Any update of a possible upload of b2 to experimental?
Yes, please.
Any update on this? Birger? nicoo?
--
Martin Michlmayr
https://www.cyrius.com/
Hi folks,
Thanks for the work already done to bring this package to debian.
Any update of a possible upload of b2 to experimental?
Cheers
Mike
Michele Cane, PhD.
hi,
On 12/3/18 12:52 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 10:10:33PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote:
>> but i'm not a DM so i can not upload it. Should i create an RFS and go
>> through mentors?
>> (also, i'm still not sure if its oke to just take the package from nicoo)
>
> Usually i
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 10:10:33PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote:
> but i'm not a DM so i can not upload it. Should i create an RFS and go
> through mentors?
> (also, i'm still not sure if its oke to just take the package from nicoo)
Usually it's not quite ok, and at the very least it's considered r
hi,
On 12/2/18 5:11 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:05:40PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote:
>> just for the record: sway depends on json-c >= 0.13, which is in
>> transition (see #904418)
>
> Regardless of this detail, would you consider uploading it to
> experimental already,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:05:40PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote:
> just for the record: sway depends on json-c >= 0.13, which is in
> transition (see #904418)
Regardless of this detail, would you consider uploading it to
experimental already, or are there any other blockers? :)
--
regards,
just for the record: sway depends on json-c >= 0.13, which is in
transition (see #904418)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
On Wed 07 Nov 2018 at 10:13PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Sean, did you see the full email that added the pending tag?
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821397;msg=56
I hadn't. Thank you.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Sean, did you see the full email that added the pending tag?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821397;msg=56
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
Hello Nicolas,
Do you recall why you tagged #821397 as pending?
AFAICT the package is not in NEW.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Sway is almost having the 1.0 version released, so I think it's time to
consider how to package it.
In case it is still the concern of including Sway, in its early
development stage, into the Debian Stretch release, holding it back
from being packaged, this might no longer be an issue, as Debian
Stretch is already in freeze, and it will take a couple more years
until the next stable release.
BTW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Oh sorry, that was my fault: I have read ITP (Intend to package) but
this unfortunately only a RFP yet.
Sorry for the spam,
Jan
Am 27.12.2016 um 17:52 schrieb Jan Luca Naumann:
> Hey,
>
> it is very nice that someone want to take care of sway for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hey,
it is very nice that someone want to take care of sway for Debian :)
What is the current status of the packaging process?
Best regards,
Jan
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:16:41 +0200 Holger Levsen
wrote:
> Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist
>
> * Pa
On 2016-04-18 3:21 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Not neccessarily:
>
> At first, sway will be uploaded to "unstable" and unstable is actually quite
> very uptodate. After some days and if it's free from bugs of severity
> "serious" and higher, it will automatically migrate to "testing".
>
> So unst
Hi Drew,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:03:44AM -0400, Drew DeVault wrote:
> Not sure how the Debian process works, so forgive me if I'm
> misunderstanding anything.
I'm glad you're asking…! :)
> My concern is that Debian is slow and sway is <1.0 right now. Will sway
> ship with Debian 9 or such and
Not sure how the Debian process works, so forgive me if I'm
misunderstanding anything.
My concern is that Debian is slow and sway is <1.0 right now. Will sway
ship with Debian 9 or such and then I'll be receiving bug reports about
version 0.* for years?
On 2016-04-18 3:16 PM, Holger Levsen wrote
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sway
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : s...@cmpwn.com
* URL : http://swaywm.org/
https://github.com/SirCmpwn/sway
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : i3-compatible window ma
59 matches
Mail list logo
