Thanks for pushing for that, it is great!
Le 10 août 2016 21:35:17 GMT+02:00, Chris Lamb a écrit :
>> > 3.9~+rc1-1~exp1 ? Someone beat me to it!
>>
>> Yes :)
>
>Thanks for uploading!
>
>
>Regards,
>
>--
> ,''`.
> : :' : Chris Lamb
> `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co
> > 3.9~+rc1-1~exp1 ? Someone beat me to it!
>
> Yes :)
Thanks for uploading!
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Le 10/08/2016 à 19:34, Chris Lamb a écrit :
Could you do the same with 3.9? fuzzer is behaving better!
3.9~+rc1-1~exp1 ? Someone beat me to it!
Regards,
Yes :)
S
> Could you do the same with 3.9? fuzzer is behaving better!
3.9~+rc1-1~exp1 ? Someone beat me to it!
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Le 04/08/2016 à 23:02, Chris Lamb a écrit :
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Uploaded!
ACCEPTED.
Regards,
Could you do the same with 3.9? fuzzer is behaving better!
Thanks
S
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Uploaded!
ACCEPTED.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Uploaded!
Le 4 août 2016 18:08:23 GMT+02:00, Chris Lamb a écrit :
>> > I wonder if a separate package would be a good idea, simply from
>the
>> > angles of:
>[..]
>> why not :)
>> The lib is 250k
>
>Also, it would keep any bug reports separate. Let me know when you
>upload
>it so I can get it th
> > I wonder if a separate package would be a good idea, simply from the
> > angles of:
[..]
> why not :)
> The lib is 250k
Also, it would keep any bug reports separate. Let me know when you upload
it so I can get it through NEW asap..
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`
Le 04/08/2016 à 17:07, Chris Lamb a écrit :
For now, I am planning to ship it in llvm-3.8-dev
Oh neat (sid!) - I would almost have been happy enough with it being
in experimental but this is much better.
I wonder if a separate package would be a good idea, simply from the
angles of:
* "Hey h
> For now, I am planning to ship it in llvm-3.8-dev
Oh neat (sid!) - I would almost have been happy enough with it being
in experimental but this is much better.
I wonder if a separate package would be a good idea, simply from the
angles of:
* "Hey how come I don't have libFuzzer but I have llv
Le 30/07/2016 à 20:39, Chris Lamb a écrit :
Should not be too hard to integrate, having a look!
Let me know if/when there is something to test. :)
Implemented locally, I will try to upload it in the next few days :)
For now, I am planning to ship it in llvm-3.8-dev (don't hesitate if you see a
> Should not be too hard to integrate, having a look!
Let me know if/when there is something to test. :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Le 29/07/2016 à 08:17, Chris Lamb a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>> llvm: libfuzzer
> Any movement on this? I was shown a cool demo yesterday by the upstream
> author and its a bit of a pain to get going in Debian. This feels a shame as
> all the sources are there, we just need to do something like:
>
> $ cl
Hi,
> llvm: libfuzzer
Any movement on this? I was shown a cool demo yesterday by the upstream author
and its a bit of a pain to get going in Debian. This feels a shame as all the
sources are there, we just need to do something like:
$ clang++ -c -g -O2 -std=c++11 Fuzzer/*.cpp -IFuzzer
$ ar r
Source: llvm-toolchain-3.8
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
As part of llvm there is a libfuzzer, see
http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html.
You actually have the sources of it as part of the various llvm
toolchain packages, but it doesn't seem like it's build.
The library doesn't really depend on llvm,
15 matches
Mail list logo
