Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-12-06 Thread Pali Rohár
On Wednesday 01 June 2016 23:25:56 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 28 April 2016 10:13:51 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2016-03-15 21:26, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) > > > > package in D

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-06-01 Thread Pali Rohár
On Thursday 28 April 2016 10:13:51 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2016-03-15 21:26, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) package > > > in Debian repository, because it is stable and is working, not > >

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-04-28 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-03-15 21:26, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) package in > > Debian repository, because it is stable and is working, not like new > > libusb-1.0-0-dev which is slow and unusable. > >

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-04-06 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 23:08:26 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-03-15 22:50, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:47:23 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > > > Aurelien, I would sug

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-03-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-03-15 22:50, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:47:23 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) > > > > > package in Debian r

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-03-15 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:47:23 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) > > > > package in Debian repository, because it is stable and is > > > > wo

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-03-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) package > > > in Debian repository, because it is stable and is working, not > > > like new libusb-1.0-0-dev which is slow and unusable. >

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-03-15 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) package > > in Debian repository, because it is stable and is working, not > > like new libusb-1.0-0-dev which is slow and unusable. > > I disagree with this statement, libusb 1.0

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-03-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-03-15 21:26, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi Aurelien! Hi, > Library libusb 1.0 is slow and unusable. Currently experimental port of > 0x to libusb 1.0 (in git) is not fully functional due to slow > listing/enumerating of connected usb devices. > > So using new libusb 1.0 is not possible to

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-03-15 Thread Pali Rohár
Hi Aurelien! Library libusb 1.0 is slow and unusable. Currently experimental port of 0x to libusb 1.0 (in git) is not fully functional due to slow listing/enumerating of connected usb devices. So using new libusb 1.0 is not possible to have working 0x application right now. 0x with

Bug#810392: 0xffff: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-01-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: 0x Version: 0.6.1-3 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, 0x has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream has released a new major version libusb 1.0 with a different API which aims to fix design deficiencies with USB 2.0 and 3.0 in mind. The old libusb 0.1 package