On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) package > > > in Debian repository, because it is stable and is working, not > > > like new libusb-1.0-0-dev which is slow and unusable. > > > > I disagree with this statement, libusb 1.0 is used in many > > applications without any problem. Contrary to libusb 0.1, it is a > > maintained library, so if you encountered any bug that makes it > > slow, unusable or whatever, please report a bug and a testcase, I am > > sure we'll find a solution. > > 3 days ago I sent email to libusb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net ML, now > waiting for reply. So hope that this problem of slow device listing will > be fixed... If you want I can CC you next.
I don't see your mail on the mailing list, it seems it hasn't arrived. Did you got any bounce message? Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
