Re: Valentin Vidic 2016-10-16
<20161016081037.btwvht6ol4ro2...@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:39:22AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Don't get me wrong, I would also like to see it handled via systemd,
> > but at the moment I think it would cause more trouble than it woul
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:39:22AM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I would also like to see it handled via systemd,
> but at the moment I think it would cause more trouble than it would
> solve.
What if we move inetd to recommends and ship systemd service in disabled
state? It
El 22/06/16 a las 09:00, Dhionel Díaz escribió:
> El 21/06/16 a las 16:36, Ferenc Wágner escribió:
>> Christoph Berg writes:
>>
>>> Re: Dhionel Díaz 2016-06-21
>>> <0c44f8f5-4d46-60e7-2bc3-d16956869...@cenditel.gob.ve>
>>>
> What about depending on inetd | systemd-sysv and invoking update-ine
El 21/06/16 a las 16:36, Ferenc Wágner escribió:
> Christoph Berg writes:
>
>> Re: Dhionel Díaz 2016-06-21
>> <0c44f8f5-4d46-60e7-2bc3-d16956869...@cenditel.gob.ve>
>>
What about depending on inetd | systemd-sysv and invoking update-inetd
only if systemd is not running?
>>
>> Doesn't t
Re: Ferenc Wágner 2016-06-22 <87vb111z5s@lant.ki.iif.hu>
> Inefficient more in the administrative sense: you're running the daemon
> via inetd (started by systemd) instead of running the daemon directly
> from systemd. But I'm not even sure this idea is feasible, as the
> conflicting units wou
Christoph Berg writes:
> Re: Ferenc Wágner 2016-06-21 <87eg7q2s9s@lant.ki.iif.hu>
>
>> Hmm, maybe you could have the csync2.socket conflict with inet.service
>> to avoid this failure mode... That would serve csync2 via inetd instead
>> of systemd, which is inefficient, but maybe acceptable.
Re: Ferenc Wágner 2016-06-21 <87eg7q2s9s@lant.ki.iif.hu>
> Christoph Berg writes:
>
> > Re: Dhionel Díaz 2016-06-21
> > <0c44f8f5-4d46-60e7-2bc3-d16956869...@cenditel.gob.ve>
> >
> >>> What about depending on inetd | systemd-sysv and invoking update-inetd
> >>> only if systemd is not running
Christoph Berg writes:
> Re: Dhionel Díaz 2016-06-21
> <0c44f8f5-4d46-60e7-2bc3-d16956869...@cenditel.gob.ve>
>
>>> What about depending on inetd | systemd-sysv and invoking update-inetd
>>> only if systemd is not running?
>
> Doesn't that fail if the system is switched to/from systemd after the
Re: Dhionel Díaz 2016-06-21
<0c44f8f5-4d46-60e7-2bc3-d16956869...@cenditel.gob.ve>
> > What about depending on inetd | systemd-sysv and invoking update-inetd
> > only if systemd is not running?
Doesn't that fail if the system is switched to/from systemd after the
package was already installed?
>
El 21/06/16 a las 02:15, Ferenc Wágner escribió:
> Dhionel Díaz writes:
>
>> El 20/06/16 a las 05:57, Christoph Berg escribió:
>>
>>> Re: Dhionel Díaz 2015-12-08 <5667290f.3060...@cenditel.gob.ve>
>>>
The attached patch was prepared to make csync2 a socket activated
service managed with
Dhionel Díaz writes:
> El 20/06/16 a las 05:57, Christoph Berg escribió:
>
>> Re: Dhionel Díaz 2015-12-08 <5667290f.3060...@cenditel.gob.ve>
>>
>>> The attached patch was prepared to make csync2 a socket activated
>>> service managed with systemd and avoid the use of inetd,
>>
>> Unfortunately
El 20/06/16 a las 05:57, Christoph Berg escribió:
> Control: tags -1 -patch
>
> Re: Dhionel Díaz 2015-12-08 <5667290f.3060...@cenditel.gob.ve>
>> The attached patch was prepared to make csync2 a socket activated
>> service managed with systemd and avoid the use of inetd,
>
> Hi Dhionel,
>
> than
Control: tags -1 -patch
Re: Dhionel Díaz 2015-12-08 <5667290f.3060...@cenditel.gob.ve>
> The attached patch was prepared to make csync2 a socket activated
> service managed with systemd and avoid the use of inetd,
Hi Dhionel,
thanks for the patch.
Unfortunately I don't think we should apply it
Package: csync2
Version: 2.0+73d3293-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Usertags: systemd-units
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
The attached patch was prepared to make csync2 a socket activated
service managed with systemd and avoid the use of inetd, i
14 matches
Mail list logo
