Re: Ferenc Wágner 2016-06-22 <87vb111z5s....@lant.ki.iif.hu> > Inefficient more in the administrative sense: you're running the daemon > via inetd (started by systemd) instead of running the daemon directly > from systemd. But I'm not even sure this idea is feasible, as the > conflicting units would be part of the startup transaction, probably > forcing it to fail.
True. Don't get me wrong, I would also like to see it handled via systemd, but at the moment I think it would cause more trouble than it would solve. Christoph
