Control: reassign -1 binutils
Control: retitle -1 please remove gold linker on sparc*
Hi Adrian,
thanks for your detailed explanation.
Given those findings, I'm going to re-assign this bug to binutils (CCing
the complete message so doko has some more context), asking for the
removal of the gold l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/08/2015 11:15 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> A quick test-build, where I removed /usr/lib/gold-ld/
> /usr/bin/gold /usr/bin/ld.gold
>
> was successful on amd64. So this approach might work. Instead of
> removing gold on sparc, it might be better
Control: tags -1 = moreinfo
Marking as moreinfo for now (and removing wontfix) since the decision
which workaround to apply (for binutils directly or systemd/affected
packages) is not yet decided.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away
Hi,
Am 07.11.2015 um 00:28 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 11/05/2015 06:14 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 05.11.2015 um 17:53 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
>>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 5:31 PM, Michael Biebl
>>> wrote:
>
Depending on what actually is broken, a workaround could also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/05/2015 06:14 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.11.2015 um 17:53 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 5:31 PM, Michael Biebl
>> wrote:
>
>>> Depending on what actually is broken, a workaround could also
>>> be to make that
Am 05.11.2015 um 17:53 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On Nov 5, 2015, at 5:31 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Depending on what actually is broken, a workaround could also be to make
>> that functionality in gold on sparc a nop instead of generating broken code.
>
> Which would probably involv
On Nov 5, 2015, at 5:31 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Am 05.11.2015 um 16:27 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
>>> On 11/05/2015 03:46 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> I see that other packages use gold as well (e.g.
>>> qtbase-opensource-src), codesearch.d.n turns up quite a few more.
>>> Are you
Am 05.11.2015 um 16:27 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 11/05/2015 03:46 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I see that other packages use gold as well (e.g.
>> qtbase-opensource-src), codesearch.d.n turns up quite a few more.
>> Are you sure that this only affects systemd?
>
> So far, yes.
How d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/05/2015 03:46 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I see that other packages use gold as well (e.g.
> qtbase-opensource-src), codesearch.d.n turns up quite a few more.
> Are you sure that this only affects systemd?
So far, yes.
> Or is this specific d
Am 30.10.2015 um 21:56 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 10/30/2015 08:35 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> The problem is that this particular fix needs larger amount of
>>> work and isn't actually trivial meaning that unless you guys are
>>> helping us and apply this (temporary) fix to systemd,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
On 10/30/2015 09:56 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Because currently any package linking against libsystemd or
> libudev, *will* fail to build from source on sparc and sparc64. In
> return, these packages have many reverse dependencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/30/2015 08:35 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> The problem is that this particular fix needs larger amount of
>> work and isn't actually trivial meaning that unless you guys are
>> helping us and apply this (temporary) fix to systemd, we will not
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/30/2015 07:04 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'm against adding such workarounds. Please just get the build
> toolchain fixed on sparc*.
The problem is that this particular fix needs larger amount of work and
isn't actually trivial meaning that un
Am 30.10.2015 um 20:32 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 10/30/2015 07:04 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I'm against adding such workarounds. Please just get the build
>> toolchain fixed on sparc*.
>
> The problem is that this particular fix needs larger amount of work and
> isn't actually triv
Am 30.10.2015 um 19:04 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 30.10.2015 um 13:59 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
>> Package: systemd
>> Version: 227-2
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> We're currently having linker issues on sparc64 for packages which link
>> against
>> libsystemd. This is a resu
Am 30.10.2015 um 13:59 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 227-2
> Severity: important
>
> Hello!
>
> We're currently having linker issues on sparc64 for packages which link
> against
> libsystemd. This is a result of systemd defaulting to gold instead of ld/bfd.
>
Control: tags -1 patch
On 10/30/2015 04:26 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/30/2015 01:59 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Could you please change the build system (e.g. rules file) such that it uses
>> ld/bfd on *both* sparc *and* sparc64 (we are planning to ressurrect sparc
>>
On 10/30/2015 01:59 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Could you please change the build system (e.g. rules file) such that it uses
> ld/bfd on *both* sparc *and* sparc64 (we are planning to ressurrect sparc
> in the future)?
More specific, please re-apply this patch [1] and extend it for spar
Package: systemd
Version: 227-2
Severity: important
Hello!
We're currently having linker issues on sparc64 for packages which link against
libsystemd. This is a result of systemd defaulting to gold instead of ld/bfd.
While there has been an exception in place for sparc [1], this does not cover
s
19 matches
Mail list logo
