On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:35:08AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> The build failed because there is now a .gitignore in the repository.
> According to dpkg-source it is an unexpected upstream change and it
> fails the build. Can the .gitignore be removed?
Oh, I assumed git-buildpackage would
The build failed because there is now a .gitignore in the repository.
According to dpkg-source it is an unexpected upstream change and it
fails the build. Can the .gitignore be removed?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:03:56AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> Oops, didn't change that
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:51:43PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:55:36AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> > user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > usertag 796711 + transition
> > usertag 796711 + patch
> > block 796711 by 790756
> > reassign 796711 release.deb
Oops, didn't change that before I committed. No, this is for unstable for the
transition.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:43:35AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Of course. The upload is meant for experimental like -3. Correct?
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015
Of course. The upload is meant for experimental like -3. Correct?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:33:03AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:08:25AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Do you want me to go ahead with uploading -3 as is then?
>
> No need, c
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:08:25AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Do you want me to go ahead with uploading -3 as is then?
No need, could you just git-buildpackage build and tag -4 ?
Thanks,
Daniel
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:48:32AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at
Do you want me to go ahead with uploading -3 as is then?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:48:32AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:35:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >
> > I just built this and was going to upload for you, but I noticed t
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:35:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I just built this and was going to upload for you, but I noticed that
> lintian complained of two errors:
>
> E: sword source: license-problem-undefined-license unknown (paragraph at line
> 25)
> E: libsword-dev: p
Daniel,
I just built this and was going to upload for you, but I noticed that
lintian complained of two errors:
E: sword source: license-problem-undefined-license unknown (paragraph at line
25)
E: libsword-dev: pkg-config-multi-arch-wrong-dir usr/lib/pkgconfig/sword.pc
full text contains archit
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:55:36AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertag 796711 + transition
> usertag 796711 + patch
> block 796711 by 790756
> reassign 796711 release.debian.org
> thanks
>
> patch attached for the transition.
>
> I need to wait for
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 796711 + transition
usertag 796711 + patch
block 796711 by 790756
reassign 796711 release.debian.org
thanks
patch attached for the transition.
I need to wait for a keyring update before I can upload myself.
Thanks,
Daniel
diff --git a/debian/ch
On 04/09/15 15:52, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Vaguely related to this, a ftp team member noted that there are open
>> RM bugs for bibledit-gtk and xiphos, which seem to be in the same
>> general area (bible study), and might get proces
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:21:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I've been meaning to help out with this for some time, but I have been
> extrememly busy the last few months. Let me at least help by making the
> upload. Can you point me to the source package?
Thanks Roberto, I'
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:07:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 15:52:58 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > Vaguely related to this, a ftp team member noted that there are open
> > > RM bugs for bibledi
Daniel,
I've been meaning to help out with this for some time, but I have been
extrememly busy the last few months. Let me at least help by making the
upload. Can you point me to the source package?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:07:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Se
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 15:52:58 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Vaguely related to this, a ftp team member noted that there are open
> > RM bugs for bibledit-gtk and xiphos, which seem to be in the same
> > general area (bible stu
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 11:24:19 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> > A new version of the library (1.7.5) is imminent and will require a
> > transition anyway. So we'll start planning the transition to libsword12.
>
> Please do the v5 t
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 11:24:19 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> A new version of the library (1.7.5) is imminent and will require a
> transition anyway. So we'll start planning the transition to libsword12.
Please do the v5 transition anyway; the wider libstdc++ transition has
eaten a month so far,
Thanks Julien,
A new version of the library (1.7.5) is imminent and will require a
transition anyway. So we'll start planning the transition to libsword12.
Regards,
Daniel
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Source: sword
> Version: 1.7.3+dfsg-2.1
> Severity: serious
> Tag
Source: sword
Version: 1.7.3+dfsg-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11
Hi,
sword's public API relies on types like std::string and std::list
provided by libstdc++6, meaning that libsword11 needs to be renamed.
Cheers,
Julien
The fol
20 matches
Mail list logo
