On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 02:48:45PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 at 11:24:19 +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote: > > A new version of the library (1.7.5) is imminent and will require a > > transition anyway. So we'll start planning the transition to libsword12. > > Please do the v5 transition anyway; [good reasons]
Hi Simon, Funnily enough as 1.7.5 wasn't as imminent as I thought I'd started preparing the transition so I should get that done either later today or at the weekend. > Vaguely related to this, a ftp team member noted that there are open > RM bugs for bibledit-gtk and xiphos, which seem to be in the same > general area (bible study), and might get processed soon. If these > are of interest to you, please reply to the removal bugs and either > say "yes, this should be removed from unstable", or say what the plan > is for fixing the issues that led to the bug. I haven't worked out who I should contact yet but I uploaded a new version of bibledit-gtk earlier in the week that had been in experimental (bibledit-gtk_4.8-1). I uploaded the source as well by mistake with bibledit-gtk_4.8-2. I got a mail saying it had been uploaded but didn't get an ACCEPT email. After I realised that I made some more changes and uploaded bibledit-gtk_4.8-3 binary only which was to close the removal bug and had the same thing happen. Regards, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
