Bug#783989: python-lockfile: Git repository for Debian packaging (was: Bug#783989: python-lockfile should be DPMT maintained)

2016-03-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 05, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Ben Finney wrote: >I have made another attempt, by using the above separation to inspire >several parallel branches: > >* master: An integration-only branch for what the DPMT team requires. >* upstream: The upstream source from released tarballs. >* pristine-tar: The

Bug#783989: python-lockfile: Git repository for Debian packaging (was: Bug#783989: python-lockfile should be DPMT maintained)

2016-03-05 Thread Ben Finney
On 30-Nov-2015, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 28, 2015, at 05:37 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > > >I'm quite loath to lose the simplicity of a Debian packaging > >repository. There is a deliberate layer of separation that has > >served very well in the VCS to date for this package: the > >separation of VC

Bug#783989: python-lockfile should be DPMT maintained

2015-11-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 28, 2015, at 05:37 PM, Ben Finney wrote: >Okay, I've been struggling mightily with Git. Both in the “working >together” sense, and in the “fighting against” sense. Can you help? I'm certainly willing to try! >I'm quite loath to lose the simplicity of a Debian packaging >repository. There

Bug#783989: python-lockfile should be DPMT maintained

2015-11-27 Thread Ben Finney
On 26-Nov-2015, Barry Warsaw wrote: > +1 for adding DPMT to Maintainers or Uploaders, but yes, it would > have to go into DPMT git as a source-full repo. Okay, I've been struggling mightily with Git. Both in the “working together” sense, and in the “fighting against” sense. Can you help? I'm qui

Bug#783989: python-lockfile should be DPMT maintained

2015-11-26 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 26, 2015, at 05:04 PM, Ben Finney wrote: >I have finished updating the Debian package for ‘python-lockfile’ >version “0.11.0”. Before I finalise the release, is now a good time to >discuss adding DPMT as a maintainer? > >Can I continue to maintain the packaging-only repository in a Bazaar >

Bug#783989: python-lockfile should be DPMT maintained

2015-11-25 Thread Ben Finney
On 06-May-2015, Ben Finney wrote: > Great! This is definitely on the list of changes I want to make for > this package. Thank you for the offer, I'll call on your help :-) I have finished updating the Debian package for ‘python-lockfile’ version “0.11.0”. Before I finalise the release, is now a go

Bug#783989: python-lockfile should be DPMT maintained

2015-05-05 Thread Ben Finney
Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: tags -1 + confirmed pending On 01-May-2015, Barry Warsaw wrote: > python-lockfile is a dependency of pip. As such, it should really be > maintained as part of the Debian Python Modules Team, and managed > under the team's version control system. I disagree

Bug#783989: python-lockfile should be DPMT maintained

2015-05-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
Package: python-lockfile Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainer, python-lockfile is a dependency of pip. As such, it should really be maintained as part of the Debian Python Modules Team, and managed under the team's version control system. I would lik