Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-02-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Release Team, The last uploaded package is now 9 days old and hasn't migrated to Jessie. Does it not qualify for an exception at this timeline now ? On 01/31/2015 04:00 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Thanks. I'll upload a new revision later today > > s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-31 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 31.01.2015 um 08:48 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > This is a follow-up on the comments that were made on changes to open-iscsi. > > Please review attached debdiff, which should have all changes included. Hi Ritesh, I think you made a mistake: you've now merged both changes (the initial ones tha

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-31 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Thanks. I'll upload a new revision later today s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On Jan 31, 2015 3:59 PM, "Christian Seiler" wrote: > Am 31.01.2015 um 08:48 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > > This is a follow-up on the comments that were made on changes to > open-iscsi. > > > > Please review atta

Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.01.2015 um 16:02 schrieb Christian Seiler: > Am 27.01.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Michael Biebl: >> Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler: >>> Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with $local_fs. That looks

Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.01.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > On 01/27/2015 08:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> As I said before: that breaks sysvinit systems with /usr on NFS. >> How likely is such a setup? I.e. using /usr-on-NFS + openisci in >> combination. Has anyone actually ever tested this? >> > > The

Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On 01/27/2015 08:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> As I said before: that breaks sysvinit systems with /usr on NFS. > How likely is such a setup? I.e. using /usr-on-NFS + openisci in > combination. Has anyone actually ever tested this? > There is no real data to show. But one uses remote storage for

Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 27.01.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler: >> Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: >>> - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with >>> $local_fs. That looks wrong anyway. >> >> As I said before: that breaks sysvi

Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler: > Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: >>> Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this? >> >> Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least >> invasive change: >> >> - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB

Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: >> Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this? > > Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least > invasive change: > > - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with > $local_fs. That looks wro

Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 26.01.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Christian Seiler: > Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this? Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least invasive change: - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with $local_fs. That looks wrong anyway

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Christian Seiler
(Since I didn't get cc'd in the original reply, I'm replying here. Sorry about that.) Am 26.01.2015 um 16:12 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > On 01/26/2015 07:54 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> unblock open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4 >> That patch doesn't look right. >> >> Calling systemctl from an in

Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On 01/26/2015 07:54 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> unblock open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4 > That patch doesn't look right. > > Calling systemctl from an init script is a big no-go. > > Second, shipping a generated unit file which does run /etc/init.d/foo is > a hack at best. > > I'd be really u

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 26.01.2015 um 08:43 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package open-iscsi > > open-iscsi currently using SysV init scripts for operation. The current > init scripts, w

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-25 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package open-iscsi open-iscsi currently using SysV init scripts for operation. The current init scripts, when run under an active systemd box, leads to a delay of 90 seconds.