Wolfgang Oertl wrote:
> On the other hand, there are many Jamfiles, and just one Jambase file,
> so if the latter could be adapted to support both build modes, it would
> probably be easier to maintain. The Jamfile could specify what should
> be a regular .a library, and what can be either.
The J
Am Wed, 13 May 2015 14:49:12 +1000
schrieb Graeme Gill :
> Modifying Jambase is the harder and more risky approach - changing
> Jamfiles is far safer and less complex.
On the other hand, there are many Jamfiles, and just one Jambase file,
so if the latter could be adapted to support both build mo
Wolfgang Oertl wrote:
> My goal was to change as little as possible, so that until the upstream
> supports that (I have been waiting quite a few months now) it can be
> used in Debian.
Modifying Jambase is the harder and more risky approach - changing
Jamfiles is far safer and less complex.
Grae
Hi!
Thanks for joining the thread.
On Wed, 13 May 2015 09:58:02 +1000
Graeme Gill wrote:
> I don't like the approach you have use at all - modifying
> Jambase to make the LibraryFromObjects rule create shared libraries
> is a hack - the correct approach is to change the Jamfiles to
> have a "bu
Wolfgang Oertl wrote:
Hi,
> As a regular user of argyll this itches enough for me to dig into the
> Jam build system and to try to modify it so it uses shared libraries.
Currently it is an important objective of mine for the ArgyllCMS tools
to be robustly portable, while executable size is a les
Hi!
As a regular user of argyll this itches enough for me to dig into the
Jam build system and to try to modify it so it uses shared libraries.
After downloading the current source package (version 1.7.0+repack) and
hacking at the Jam files I have arrived at a point where it builds, with
some ca
Am 25.09.2014 um 21:57 schrieb Jörg Frings-Fürst:
> Hello Michael,
>
> first thanks for your work this and the two other bugs.
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 25.09.2014, 18:45 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> [...]
>> The following packages will be upgraded:
>> argyll
>> 1 upgraded, 2 newly installed,
Am 09.05.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Jörg Frings-Fürst:
> Hi,
>
> the major change between 1.5 and 1.6 was the build system change from
> the not upstream supported gnu make back to the upstream supported jam
> based system.
>
> With the current version the jam built system use no shared libraries.
>
Hi,
the major change between 1.5 and 1.6 was the build system change from
the not upstream supported gnu make back to the upstream supported jam
based system.
With the current version the jam built system use no shared libraries.
The problem is first the almost non-existent Jam documentation and
I noticed the same issue. I think it is not sensible for this package
to require >50 MB disk space. Is there any compelling reason for
statically linking these binaries? I don't think that there is a
relevant performance increase. So, please revert this change! Just my
2¢.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Am 25.09.2014 um 23:13 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> for amd64 (1.6.3-1):
> package size: 3,418.3 kB installed size: 52,195.0 kB
>
> for i386 (1.5)
> package size: 3,414.2 kB installed size: 7,490.0 kB
The difference between 1.5. and 1.6 seems to be, that the invididual
binaries are much larger. Afai
Hi,
Am 25.09.2014 um 21:57 schrieb Jörg Frings-Fürst:
> Am Donnerstag, den 25.09.2014, 18:45 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> [...]
>> The following packages will be upgraded:
>> argyll
>> 1 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
>> Need to get 5979 kB of archives.
>> After t
Hello Michael,
first thanks for your work this and the two other bugs.
Am Donnerstag, den 25.09.2014, 18:45 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl:
[...]
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> argyll
> 1 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
> Need to get 5979 kB of archives.
Package: argyll
Version: 1.6.3-1
Severity: important
todays upgrade presented me with
The following packages will be upgraded:
argyll
1 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
Need to get 5979 kB of archives.
After this operation, 50.2 MB of additional disk space will be us
14 matches
Mail list logo
