Apparently Cleto Martin already created a package on alioth for it:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/libjsoncpp.git
I will start working from here.
Greetings
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Hi Jose!
ABI compat. has been double checked by the upstream author and by me. I
also managed to get him signing releases. All bugfixes have been
backported from 1.4.x branch and will also be backported in the future,
which makes simpler for us to package it.
So everything is very fine with versi
Hi Peter.
I contacted with my mentor for this package (Cleto Martin). He is the
owner of the Bitbucket repository and the one that can give you write
access to it.
In addition, I'm not very familiar with debian-alioth, but if you see
that it's a better option than Bitbucket, I'll be happy with th
Hi Jose!
I haven't heard back from you about co-maintainership of jsoncpp. What
is the current status?
I am having very much contact with upstream for supporting a stable
0.8.x release that replaces old 0.6.x for stable.
Additionally we should consider packaging latest 1.x release for
experiment
Hi!
That is great to here. Upstream is currently working on ABI
compatiblity. About the repo. My user on bitbucket is cinemast.
Maybe we could switch to collab-maint on alioth?
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/collab-maint/
But therefore we would both need to be suggested by a DD to accept our
Hi!
Of course, you can! I'm very glad to work with you in this package.
We have a repository with the debianization of the package, using
git-buildpackage thanks to Cleto Martin. This repository is hosted in
Bitbucket, so if you have an account there, we can grant you the write
permissions.
Curr
Upstream is actually very active and willing to help us out with keeping
ABI compatiblity.
It seems it is possible except for one issue, which would break support
for ARM. I do not have enough knowledge about this to give upstream good
advices on that.
If that could be fixed, it seems that we cou
Hello José,
you coming back is a very good news. But maybe you should consider the
proposal of Peter of co-maintainance? Just an idea, as I would not be
involved...
Thanks for your time,
Mt.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:25:03AM +0100, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I'm very sorry.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Bug#762330: Is libjsoncpp still active maintained?
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:47:00 +
From: Peter Spiess-Knafl
To: José Luis Segura Lucas
Hi!
Can I offer co-maintainership? I already put a some work in packaging
(not yet released 0.8) and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
I'm very sorry. My e-mail filters made a mess and I was losing all this
e-mails. I realize of them thanks to Peter's e-mail, so a lot of thanks
to you!
I was not aware about the newer upstream version. I will work this week
on the package to
ABI breakage is not a problem. Upstream should simply bump the so name
of the library, and you're set. If upstream does not do so, you can do
it yourself (but it would be better to do it for all distros and OSes).
It's even a good news to have an active upstream that cleans up
his/her house and pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am currently in discussion with the upstream author:
https://github.com/open-source-parsers/jsoncpp/issues/147
ABI compatibility looks terrible.
On 01/27/2015 12:57 PM, Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:41:49AM +, Peter Spiess
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:41:49AM +, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> The actual maintainer seems unresponsive. I contacted him 2 months ago
> and pinged again now, no luck so far.
>
> Can I adopt it, if there is no RFA? What if the current maintainer does
> not answer at all?
>
> Anyway I will s
The actual maintainer seems unresponsive. I contacted him 2 months ago
and pinged again now, no luck so far.
Can I adopt it, if there is no RFA? What if the current maintainer does
not answer at all?
Anyway I will start packaging current 0.7.x. And maybe the latest 1.3
for experimental.
Would yo
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:04:57AM +, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> Is this package still active maintained? If not, I would be very
> interested in co-maintaining or adopting the package.
I would say that it is not. I had to upload a version to fix a bug in
a dependency, but I then discovered t
Is this package still active maintained? If not, I would be very
interested in co-maintaining or adopting the package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: libjsoncpp0
Version: 0.6.0~rc2-3
Severity: wishlist
Dear José,
the libjsoncpp packages is outdated and upstream provided fixes for a
couple of issues (cf. #753560, which spoils minetest).
Please update the package for jessie.
Thanks and best regards,
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
17 matches
Mail list logo
