Bug#759794: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2015-10-06 Thread Gert Wollny
Disk space used for building of ITK 4.8 with only 2 and 3 dimensions to wrap: chroot base system with all deps installed: 3.0GB Source code unpacked: ~1.0GB Build dir 36GB Debian dir 5.1GB Sum: 42GB Total:

Bug#759794: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2015-10-05 Thread Gert Wollny
Hello Steven, On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 11:09 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > There are two things that could probably help: > > > > - change the python-binding dimensions to use only 2 an 3. > > I can definitely make this change for the next upload. > Did you ever quantify whether this saves

Bug#759794: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2015-10-04 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hello Gert, I ran into this issue again today which prompted me to re-read this bug log. On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:15:19 +0200 Gert Wollny wrote: > > insighttoolkit4 repeatedly FTBFS on amd64 [1] because of ENOSPC. A > > manual build on porterbox barriere.debian.org reported a need of ~44GB > > whi

Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2014-09-02 Thread Gilles Filippini
Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 31/08/2014 10:47: > Kurt Roeckx a écrit , Le 30/08/2014 22:32: >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 08:10:41PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: insighttoolkit4 repeatedly FTBFS on amd64 [1] because of ENOSPC. A

Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2014-08-31 Thread Gilles Filippini
Kurt Roeckx a écrit , Le 30/08/2014 22:32: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 08:10:41PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: >>> insighttoolkit4 repeatedly FTBFS on amd64 [1] because of ENOSPC. A >>> manual build on porterbox barriere.debian.org re

Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2014-08-30 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:32:50PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 08:10:41PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: > > > insighttoolkit4 repeatedly FTBFS on amd64 [1] because of ENOSPC. A > > > manual build on porterbox

Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2014-08-30 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 08:10:41PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: > > insighttoolkit4 repeatedly FTBFS on amd64 [1] because of ENOSPC. A > > manual build on porterbox barriere.debian.org reported a need of ~44GB > > while it failed on

Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2014-08-30 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote: > insighttoolkit4 repeatedly FTBFS on amd64 [1] because of ENOSPC. A > manual build on porterbox barriere.debian.org reported a need of ~44GB > while it failed on buildd barber at approx 37GB of disk space. > > [1] https://buildd.de

Bug#759794: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2014-08-30 Thread Gert Wollny
> insighttoolkit4 repeatedly FTBFS on amd64 [1] because of ENOSPC. A > manual build on porterbox barriere.debian.org reported a need of ~44GB > while it failed on buildd barber at approx 37GB of disk space. There are two things that could probably help: - change the python-binding dimensions to

Bug#759794: insighttoolkit4: FTBFS on amd64 with ENOSPC

2014-08-30 Thread Gilles Filippini
Source: insighttoolkit4 Version: 4.6.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, insighttoolkit4 repeatedly FTBFS on amd64 [1] because of ENOSPC. A manual build on porterbox barriere.debian.org reported a need of ~44GB while it failed o