Hi Olly,
sitplus has changed a lot upstream. The packaging is quite some effort
I can currently not do. First libsitplus needs to be packaged. Since
Luis has commited previously that he also has no time I'm not sure how
quickly we can come up with a solution.
Just to let you know.
Kind regard
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 01:53:09PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> upgrading sitplus requires packaging libsitplus first and base the new
> sitplus on this lib. I plan to work on this but I'm not sure when I'll
> be able to get this done. If all else fails we will miss the package in
> Jessie.
It'
Hi Olly,
upgrading sitplus requires packaging libsitplus first and base the new
sitplus on this lib. I plan to work on this but I'm not sure when I'll
be able to get this done. If all else fails we will miss the package in
Jessie.
Thanks for the ping anyway
Andreas.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:38:02AM +0200, Cesar Mauri wrote:
> >> Changes are available in git repo, branch
> >> develop. If needed I could prepare several tarballs. Is enough?
> > I guess yes if you would clarify the role of libsitplus. Is this
> > something sitplus would depend from or just an e
Hi Andreas,
>> Changes are available in git repo, branch
>> develop. If needed I could prepare several tarballs. Is enough?
> I guess yes if you would clarify the role of libsitplus. Is this
> something sitplus would depend from or just an extract for those who
> simply want to link their own pro
Hi Cesar,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 08:10:06PM +0200, Cesar Mauri wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> >> I'm CCing César Mauri, the upstream developer, just in case he wants
> >> to add something to the discussion.
> > César, if you would be willing to spent some time into the packaging for
> > Debian while w
Hi Andreas,
>> I'm CCing César Mauri, the upstream developer, just in case he wants
>> to add something to the discussion.
> César, if you would be willing to spent some time into the packaging for
> Debian while we would be happy to help you in packaging questions we
> would consider keeping the
Hi Luis,
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 12:54:21PM -0500, Luis Rivas wrote:
> > I had another look into sitplus 1.1.0 upstream and it seems there is a
> > split between libsitplus and sitplus. From the download file layout
> > libsitplus looks similar to our packaged sitplus 1.0.3 and the upstream
> > s
2014-08-22 2:55 GMT-05:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Luis,
Hi, Andreas.
> I had another look into sitplus 1.1.0 upstream and it seems there is a
> split between libsitplus and sitplus. From the download file layout
> libsitplus looks similar to our packaged sitplus 1.0.3 and the upstream
> sitplus-1.1
Hi Luis,
I had another look into sitplus 1.1.0 upstream and it seems there is a
split between libsitplus and sitplus. From the download file layout
libsitplus looks similar to our packaged sitplus 1.0.3 and the upstream
sitplus-1.1.0 has a structure which I would consider "broken"
considering tha
Hi Olly,
thanks for spotting the new version which was hidden from our sentinel
due to an insufficient debian/watch file. Luis or Dmitrijs, you both
touched the package before. Would you volunteer to work on the new
upstream version? I did some minor polishing of the debian/ dir
(including fixi
Source: sitplus
Version: 1.0.3-4
Severity: important
Tags: sid jessie
User: freewx-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: wx3.0
Control: block 748169 by -1
Dear maintainer,
We're aiming to migrate the archive to using wxwidgets3.0 instead of
wxwidgets2.8, and intend to drop wxwidgets2.8 before j
12 matches
Mail list logo
