Bug#750516: mandos: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-06-12 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 12/06/2014 20:16, Teddy Hogeborn wrote: > >> Arthur's patch is doing the correct implementation (static function in >> the same object file). > The "correct" implementation? We have, in our program, chosen to use > many non-standardized extensions: We use Linux-specific features and not > only

Bug#750516: mandos: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-06-12 Thread Teddy Hogeborn
Sylvestre Ledru writes: > > > Nested functions are NOT part of the C and C++ standard: > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_function#Languages > > > > > > The gcc support is a mistake. > > > > "Nested functions" is an official GCC extension: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.0

Bug#750516: Fwd: Re: Bug#750516: mandos: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-06-12 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 12/06/2014 15:23, Teddy Hogeborn wrote: > Sylvestre Ledru writes: > >> Nested functions are NOT part of the C and C++ standard: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_function#Languages >> >> The gcc support is a mistake. > > "Nested functions" is an official GCC extension: > > https://gcc.g

Bug#750516: Fwd: Re: Bug#750516: mandos: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-06-12 Thread Teddy Hogeborn
Sylvestre Ledru writes: > Nested functions are NOT part of the C and C++ standard: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_function#Languages > > The gcc support is a mistake. "Nested functions" is an official GCC extension: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.0/gcc/Nested-Functions.html /Ted

Bug#750516: Fwd: Re: Bug#750516: mandos: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-06-12 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Teddy, could you help us here? Nested functions are NOT part of the C and C++ standard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_function#Languages The gcc support is a mistake. Thanks S On 04/06/2014 16:53, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Yes, clang does not support this GCC extension. > > However, it is

Bug#750516: Fwd: Re: Bug#750516: mandos: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-06-04 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Yes, clang does not support this GCC extension. However, it is a minor change with a low impact. It would clearly help our goal to have a Debian version built with clang. It would be nice if you could reconsider your position. Thanks, Sylvestre > tags 750516 + wontfix > stop > > Arthur Marble

Bug#750516: mandos: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc

2014-06-03 Thread Arthur Marble
Package: mandos Severity: minor Usertags: clang-ftbfs User: pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Tag: patch Hello, Using the rebuild infrastructure, your package fails to build with clang (instead of gcc). Thanks, Arthur diff -Naur mandos.orig/mandos-1.6.5/debian/changelog mandos/mandos-1.6.5/