On 12/06/2014 20:16, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
>
>> Arthur's patch is doing the correct implementation (static function in
>> the same object file).
> The "correct" implementation?  We have, in our program, chosen to use
> many non-standardized extensions: We use Linux-specific features and not
> only those of the POSIX kernel functions.  We use GLibc-specific
> features and not only those of the POSIX standard library.  We also, as
> you have noticed, use features specific to GCC and not only those of the
> ANSI C standard.  Is this not "correct"?
>
Thanks for helping the work of other in Debian :(

Sylvestre


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to