שלום, יש קרנות ירושה ללא דורש הוריש בשמך מלקוח שלי המנוח שיש לו את אותו שם
משפחה ולאום איתך. צור איתי קשר לקבלת פרטים
On Sunday, 23 February, 2014 17:16:19 David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:15:30AM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> > If., due to whatever problem, at repo site or local internet or anywhere
> > in
> > between, one cannot access the site for desired distro, i.e. "unstable,"
> > but can
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:15:30AM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> If., due to whatever problem, at repo site or local internet or anywhere in
> between, one cannot access the site for desired distro, i.e. "unstable," but
> can access "experimental," apt will take packages from there.
That could be,
Here is the gist of it:
If., due to whatever problem, at repo site or local internet or anywhere in
between, one cannot access the site for desired distro, i.e. "unstable," but
can access "experimental," apt will take packages from there.
It should not do this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Today, apt-get upgrade wants to give me all kinds of experimental packages!
Those including the libc6 stuff that got messed over last week. I in no way
request this. This is the bug.
I enclose sources.list if this be of any help here.
Were I to simply do this upgrade routinely, what a mess ther
Please disregard post of maybe 1/2 hour ago. This was written last week,
failed to send because of broken system.
Update: Up and Running Once Again (phew!)
Googled on chroot input output error, found a arch-linux thread which lead me
to the solution: The libs were being loaded from i868/cmov se
Still no bootable system. However, instead of missing sh when chroot
from live CD and missing init when attempting to reboot, I have
input/output error.
Clues? Has to be on root as opposed to usr or such because only that
partition is mounted at the time. Something on /lib or /lib/i386-...
--
T
This was the second time apt-get upgrade placed packages from
experimental (when I am using Sid). The first time, I noticed in time
and stopped it (always run -s first!). This time, I did not notice.
So it placed several experimental packages include libc6-2.18.
System was bootable with this. A
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:59:05PM +, Claudio Moretti wrote:
> IMHO, the reporter added experimental sources (like I did) and pinned
> them in some way that prioritizes experimental over unstable (or lower).
(I tried (dist-)
Package: apt
Followup-For: Bug #738909
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Maintainer,
I cannot reproduce this bug.
I held apt before a dist-upgrade because of this bug; after reading it,
I unheld it and installed it.
I was not asked to remove anything; "apt-get instal
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:49:19PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Will remove everything, libc6 and all if I let it.
This is unlikely, like really, so please mention the EXACT command you
run and include the COMPLETE output of it. With a oneline summary nobody
can help you.
You can also attach the f
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.15.1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Will remove everything, libc6 and all if I let it.
Following packages are broken:
libc-bin, libc6 libc6-dbg, libc6-i686, libc6:amd64
Apt-get upgrade tried to install experimental versions and experimen
12 matches
Mail list logo
