Bug#736892: OK, here's the /proc/cpuinfo data

2014-02-08 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:25:30 -0500 (EST), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Can you confirm that, at the moment of this /proc/cpuinfo, sysfs was showing > > the microcode of cpu1 and cpu3 to be outdated (i.e. not 0x6000822) ? The "microcode version

Bug#736892: OK, here's the /proc/cpuinfo data

2014-02-07 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
tag 736892 fixed-upstream thanks On Tue, 04 Feb 2014, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:25:30 -0500 (EST), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > > Can you confirm that, at the moment of this /proc/cpuinfo, sysfs was showing > > the microcode of cpu1 and cpu3 to be outdated (i.e. n

Bug#736892: OK, here's the /proc/cpuinfo data

2014-02-04 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:25:30 -0500 (EST), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Can you confirm that, at the moment of this /proc/cpuinfo, sysfs was showing > the microcode of cpu1 and cpu3 to be outdated (i.e. not 0x6000822) ? Yes, absolutely. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'

Bug#736892: OK, here's the /proc/cpuinfo data

2014-02-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014, Stephen Powell wrote: > OK, here's the /proc/cpuinfo data you asked for. > This is right after a reboot: Can you confirm that, at the moment of this /proc/cpuinfo, sysfs was showing the microcode of cpu1 and cpu3 to be outdated (i.e. not 0x6000822) ? -- "One disk to rule t

Bug#736892: OK, here's the /proc/cpuinfo data

2014-02-01 Thread Stephen Powell
OK, here's the /proc/cpuinfo data you asked for. This is right after a reboot: - processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 21 model : 2 model name : AMD FX(tm)-4300 Quad-Core Processor stepping: 0 microcode : 0x6000822 cpu MHz :