Hi Marcelo,
> I'm late, but only for clarify why I created the jquery-goodies package.
>
> See:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2009-May/000238.html
Thanks, it is a very useful package :-)
When talking to our upstream developers about the way they use
JavaScript,
Hi,
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 11:36 +, Daniel James wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I have checked the list above, and only galette
> depends on a specific version of libjs-jquery-cookie, in this case (>= 8).
>
> I guess the current version numbering was chosen because the source
> package jquery-
Quoting Daniel James (2014-02-03 11:28:57)
> Hi Raphael,
> > $ dpkg -c galette_0.7.6.1-2_all.deb |grep cookie
> > lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2013-11-05 10:03
> > ./usr/share/galette/includes/jquery/jquery.cookie.js ->
> > ../../../javascript/jquery-cookie/jquery.cookie.js
> >
> > So there's n
Hi Raphael,
> $ dpkg -c galette_0.7.6.1-2_all.deb |grep cookie
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2013-11-05 10:03
> ./usr/share/galette/includes/jquery/jquery.cookie.js ->
> ../../../javascript/jquery-cookie/jquery.cookie.js
>
> So there's no bug here regarding jquery-cookie.
Sorry, I did not rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 2014-02-01 02:19, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jerome Charaoui wrote:
>> Le 2014-01-31 12:12, Daniel James a écrit :
I think switching to upstream numbering is still possible. by
using an epoch number. The new versio
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Jerome Charaoui wrote:
> Le 2014-01-31 12:12, Daniel James a écrit :
> >> I think switching to upstream numbering is still possible. by
> >> using an epoch number. The new version number for
> >> libjs-jquery-cookie would be 1:1.4.0 (epoch 1) which would be
> >> more rece
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 2014-01-31 12:12, Daniel James a écrit :
> Hi Jerome,
>
>> I think switching to upstream numbering is still possible. by
>> using an epoch number. The new version number for
>> libjs-jquery-cookie would be 1:1.4.0 (epoch 1) which would be
>> mor
Quoting Jerome Charaoui (2014-01-31 16:12:44)
> Le 2014-01-31 06:36, Daniel James a écrit :
>> Thanks for the reply. I have checked the list above, and only galette
>> depends on a specific version of libjs-jquery-cookie, in this case
>> (>= 8).
>>
>> I guess the current version numbering was ch
Hi Jerome,
> I think switching to upstream numbering is still possible. by
> using an epoch number. The new version number for libjs-jquery-cookie
> would be 1:1.4.0 (epoch 1) which would be more recent than 8-2 (epoch
> 0).
It may not be necessary to use an epoch just for galette, as galette
app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 2014-01-31 06:36, Daniel James a écrit :
> Thanks for the reply. I have checked the list above, and only
> galette depends on a specific version of libjs-jquery-cookie, in
> this case (>= 8).
>
> I guess the current version numbering was chosen b
Hi Jerome,
> More than a few packages in Debian depend on the currently packaged
> version. Do you know if such an update would introduce incompatible
> changes?
>
> libjs-jquery-cookie
> Reverse Depends:
> spip
> spotweb
> python-django-debug-toolbar
> python-tables-doc
> openstack-das
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
More than a few packages in Debian depend on the currently packaged
version. Do you know if such an update would introduce incompatible
changes?
libjs-jquery-cookie
Reverse Depends:
spip
spotweb
python-django-debug-toolbar
python-tables-doc
Package: libjs-jquery-cookie
Version: 8-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I am preparing a package with a dependency on libjs-jquery-cookie which
will require a recent version.
The Javascript file in the package
http://packages.debian.org/sid/libjs-jquery-cookie might be version 1.0
from the year 2010
13 matches
Mail list logo
