On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...Reading
> > > > symbols from
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9.2.0...done.
>
No problem. Will send it over in a few hours.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 12:12 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:04 -0600, Jeff Clark wrote:
>> > Samba needs the hdb plugin updated to support hdb version 8.
>> >
>> >
>>
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 12:12 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:04 -0600, Jeff Clark wrote:
> > Samba needs the hdb plugin updated to support hdb version 8.
> >
> >
> >
> > Heimdal needs the hdb callback function patched because even when the
> > plugin is registered properl
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:04 -0600, Jeff Clark wrote:
> Samba needs the hdb plugin updated to support hdb version 8.
>
>
>
> Heimdal needs the hdb callback function patched because even when the
> plugin is registered properly, it segfaults because the pointer is
> never set properly in _krb5_plu
Samba needs the hdb plugin updated to support hdb version 8.
Heimdal needs the hdb callback function patched because even when the
plugin is registered properly, it segfaults because the pointer is never
set properly in _krb5_plugin_run_f. Looks like the plugin code was
recently updated but never
On 14-01-07 08:29 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>What are the relevant values of "in-sync-ness" for heimdal?
I would prefer it was exactly the version we have in-tree, but that's
now quite old.
So, it would seem that the present solution is that samba should be
updating the heimdal snapshot, doc
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 14:29 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > > > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...Reading
> > > > > symbols from
> > >
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...Reading
> > > > symbols from
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9.2.0...done.
>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...Reading
> > > symbols from
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9.2.0...done.
> > > done.
> > > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 15:11 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:48:16PM -0500, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> > It is surprisingly difficult to get a stack trace, even with
> > samba-dbg and heimdal-dbg installed:
>
> > #0 0x in ?? ()
> > #1 0x7f58b4821ff5 in ??
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:48:16PM -0500, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> It is surprisingly difficult to get a stack trace, even with
> samba-dbg and heimdal-dbg installed:
> #0 0x in ?? ()
> #1 0x7f58b4821ff5 in ?? ()
> #2 0x7fff2c599618 in ?? ()
> #3 0x7f58ba31f260 in ?? (
It is surprisingly difficult to get a stack trace, even with samba-dbg
and heimdal-dbg installed:
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x7f58b4821ff5 in ?? ()
#2 0x7fff2c599618 in ?? ()
#3 0x7f58ba31f260 in ?? ()
#4 0x7f58ba8e57e0 in ?? ()
#5 0x7f58ba2c6280 in ?? ()
#6 0x
12 matches
Mail list logo
