On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...Reading > > > symbols from > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9.2.0...done. > > > done. > > > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9
> > > That happened with the samba server in PDC mode, running "passwd" > > > via sssd or changing the password via Windows 8. > > I'm sorry to say that this stack trace shows signs of stack corruption. > > "0x0000000000000000" and "0x0000000000000008" are not valid addresses to > > appear in a backtrace. > > You may have better luck debugging by running under valgrind, which can > > often detect stack corruption errors at runtime /before/ they clobber the > > stack. > I strongly suspect in this and in 734355 that Heimdal and Samba have got > out of sync. We use libhdb (and other parts) from Heimdal in a quite > intimate manner. By "intimate", do you mean "using private interfaces"? What are the relevant values of "in-sync-ness" for heimdal? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
