Hi!
I have verified that the 3.15-rc5 kernel on experimental works as expected,
the fix works, unfortunately, Lukas, I'm afraid it also breaks your setup,
this is what I have verified:
# ip link add br1 address fc:cc:cc:cc:cc:cc type bridge
# ip link set br1 up
# ip a s dev br1
6: br1: mtu 1500
Hi,
sorry, I really don't have anything valuable to add (and I have no idea
which kernel versions changed the behavior). However, if you want me to
try out a new solution at some point I'll be happy to do so.
Just for the record, I use the following configuration which works fine
for my case:
if
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Santiago Garcia Mantinan
wrote:
> Yes, Lukas case is different, but the case I found that is not working on
> 3.2 is not Lukas'. This case is based on a bridge with a card but which
> forces a different MAC on the bridge, not the MAC of the card that is
> attached.
On May 04 2014, Leoš Bitto wrote:
> I think that the crucial difference is that I start the bridge with
> one interface added (eth0), but Lukas starts the bridge without any
> interface. These two cases are very different - my case has a simple
> solution (see my previous comment), the case for Luk
I think that the crucial difference is that I start the bridge with
one interface added (eth0), but Lukas starts the bridge without any
interface. These two cases are very different - my case has a simple
solution (see my previous comment), the case for Lukas is more
complicated (depends on kernel
Ok, I thought you would understand my previous thread with lukas, I was
trying to set up the bridge address with ip link set on an experimental
package I have on my desktop but on kernel 3.2 my results were this:
If I force it with my method it sets the mac on the bridge and it is forced,
but the
>
> Leos, your info seems to be of a patch from 2008, so it would be on 3.2,
> wouldn't make a differencde between 3.2 and 3.11 or later, so I guess that's
> not the patch, but thanks anyway.
>
Just to make sure we all understand it the same way - this is what is
written at https://bugzilla.redhat
Hi!
I'm coming again over this, sorry it took me so long...
Leos, your info seems to be of a patch from 2008, so it would be on 3.2,
wouldn't make a differencde between 3.2 and 3.11 or later, so I guess that's
not the patch, but thanks anyway.
Lukas, have you come to a setup that works on your c
8 matches
Mail list logo
