On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 10:45 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:32:09PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm really not sure having circular dependencies in python modules is a
> >> real problem. It should
On 08/08/2013 10:45 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:32:09PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm really not sure having circular dependencies in python modules is a
>> real problem. It should work just fine. That would be different if we
>> were talking about compile
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:32:09PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm really not sure having circular dependencies in python modules is a
> real problem. It should work just fine. That would be different if we
> were talking about compiled libraries.
No, the upgrade issue is independent f
Hi,
I'm really not sure having circular dependencies in python modules is a
real problem. It should work just fine. That would be different if we
were talking about compiled libraries.
Thoughts?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
4 matches
Mail list logo