On 2013-04-28 18:08, Jakub Wilk wrote:
|
| Override for wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid was added by you without
| any comment.
Comes from maintainer's patch 20 (UID/GIDs). Added a comment.
Thanks,
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
* jari , 2013-04-28, 17:53:
O: i810switch: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/bin/i810switch 0/141
This looks very wrong. What is this override for?
It's the maintainer's override with comment:
"# SetUID required to rotate the video output"
No, this is comment for setuid-binary.
Override
On 2013-04-28 14:21, Jakub Wilk wrote:
| > $ git clone http://cante.net/~jaalto/vc/i810switch.git i810switch.git
| > $ cd i810switch
|
| Did you mean "cd i810switch.git" here?
Yes.
| >$ lintian --display-info --show-overrides --display-experimental --pedantic
../i810switch_0.6.5-7.1_i386.de
Control: retitle -1 lintian: false-positive statically-linked-binary when run
with root privs
Control: severity -1 minor
* Jari Aalto , 2013-04-28, 14:06:
$ git clone http://cante.net/~jaalto/vc/i810switch.git i810switch.git
$ cd i810switch
Did you mean "cd i810switch.git" here?
$ lin
On 2013-04-28 12:34, Jakub Wilk wrote:
| * Jari Aalto , 2013-04-28, 10:32:
| >Lintian reports statically-linked-binary on i386 but I'm not sure
| >why. Could this be a false positive? The sources for testing are
| >available at:
| >
| > git clone http://cante.net/~jaalto/vc/i810switch.git
| >
| >
* Jari Aalto , 2013-04-28, 10:32:
Lintian reports statically-linked-binary on i386 but I'm not sure why.
Could this be a false positive? The sources for testing are available
at:
git clone http://cante.net/~jaalto/vc/i810switch.git
Listing:
# Lintian error
E: i810switch: statically-
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.10.5
Severity: normal
Lintian reports statically-linked-binary on i386 but I'm not sure
why. Could this be a false positive? The sources for testing are
available at:
git clone http://cante.net/~jaalto/vc/i810switch.git
Listing:
# Lintian error
E: i810s
7 matches
Mail list logo