Hi,
adequate is now installed on piu-slave-bm-a.d.o and the patch has been applied
there too, IOW all new piuparts tests running there will fire up adequate at
the end \o/
Plus I rescheduled these (known failing) packages in sid + wheezy, so tomorrow
we shall have some failures found:
openssh
On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Now tracked as #709187.
> Nah, /usr/share/doc/ is already whitelisted. :)
> Now tracked as #709192.
> And I've just uploaded adequate_0.5.2~bpo70+1 to backports-master.
cool!
:-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
* Holger Levsen , 2013-05-21, 13:18:
FWIW, this is a false-positive: apport never imports these files[0], so
there's no benefit from byte-compilation. I'll whitelist
/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/ in the next release.
good, thanks.
Now tracked as #709187.
python-apt-common: py-file-not-by
* Holger Levsen , 2013-05-21, 12:55:
root@matrix:~# adequate --all
openssh-client: py-file-not-bytecompiled
/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/openssh-client.py
FWIW, this is a false-positive: apport never imports these files[0], so
there's no benefit from byte-compilation. I'll whitelist
/usr/
Hi Andreas,
On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I just started running adequate in my instance, too.
\o/ :)
> Do you have some examples for inadequate packages that I could retest?
root@matrix:~# adequate --all
openssh-client: py-file-not-bytecompiled /usr/share/apport/package-
On 2013-05-18 15:33, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Holger Levsen , 2013-05-18, 14:22:
>> did you run adequate against the archive? did it give adequate
>> results? or should we expect a lot of issues when running it against
I just started running adequate in my instance, too.
Do you have some examples for
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
>> I do however test every release by running --all on my own system.
>> Currently adequate emits tags for about 3% packages here.
>
> 3% of 40k means... about 1200 issues to be fixed. whoa. So we'll indeed start
> with warnings only.
>
>
If
Hi,
On Samstag, 18. Mai 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I haven't run it archive-wide.
ok.
> I do however test every release by running --all on my own system.
> Currently adequate emits tags for about 3% packages here.
3% of 40k means... about 1200 issues to be fixed. whoa. So we'll indeed start
w
* Holger Levsen , 2013-05-18, 14:22:
did you run adequate against the archive? did it give adequate results?
or should we expect a lot of issues when running it against 40k
packages?
I haven't run it archive-wide.
I do however test every release by running --all on my own system.
Currently a
Hi Jakub,
did you run adequate against the archive? did it give adequate results? or
should we expect a lot of issues when running it against 40k packages?
cheers,
Holger, just curious! :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
10 matches
Mail list logo
