Thomas Schwinge, le Sat 02 Feb 2013 11:37:24 +0100, a écrit :
> > But yes, we do consider dropping the MACH macro, we have checked the
> > Debian source for such macros, it should be fine.
>
> Ah, have you checked already?
IIRC yes, and it was very limited. Not a reason for not undefining it at
l
Hi!
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:30:00 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Bronson, le Sat 02 Feb 2013 00:39:29 -0500, a écrit :
> > The Hurd people should probably investigate whether a MACH macro is
> > actually useful in the first place: Why not __MACH__? Is there
> > something which would stop w
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 09:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Bronson, le Sat 02 Feb 2013 00:39:29 -0500, a écrit :
> > The Hurd people should probably investigate whether a MACH macro is
> > actually useful in the first place: Why not __MACH__? Is there
> > something which would stop working
Samuel Bronson, le Sat 02 Feb 2013 00:39:29 -0500, a écrit :
> The Hurd people should probably investigate whether a MACH macro is
> actually useful in the first place: Why not __MACH__? Is there
> something which would stop working if MACH were no longer defined?
Well, this is the same under Lin
Package: gdb
Version: 7.4.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
gdb has been failing to build on hurd [1] since 7.4.1-1 (build attempted
2012-04-26), with error messages like:
> /build/buildd-gdb_7.4.1+dfsg-0.1-hurd-i386-IqN_9W/gdb-7.4.1+dfsg/opcodes/../include/opcode/h8300.h:82:3:
> error: exp
5 matches
Mail list logo
