Samuel Bronson, le Sat 02 Feb 2013 00:39:29 -0500, a écrit : > The Hurd people should probably investigate whether a MACH macro is > actually useful in the first place: Why not __MACH__? Is there > something which would stop working if MACH were no longer defined?
Well, this is the same under Linux with the "linux" macro, and "i386", etc. :) But yes, we do consider dropping the MACH macro, we have checked the Debian source for such macros, it should be fine. I however don't know how far we are on this, anybody? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
