Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-10 Thread Norbert Preining
On Do, 10 Jan 2013, Frank Küster wrote: > did you notice this? Any ideas? Yes yes, and I answered ... there are many emails on bug-texinfo and the problem is on the binutils side and has been fixed upstream already. It was wrongly coded texinfo source. Thanks Frank for taking so good care

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-10 Thread Frank Kuester
Norbert, did you notice this? Any ideas? Frank Paul Wise writes: > Source: binutils > Version: 2.23.1-1~exp3 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org > > binutils 2.23.1-1~exp3 FTBFS with texinfo 4.13.92.dfsg.1-1 from > experimental. There are some warnings that se

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-07 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:09:29PM +, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Patrice, > > >Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and > >errors. > > > >In my opinion, it falls in the 'minor changes' case with respect to > >copyright. > > Thanks. I have applied your patch along

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-07 Thread nick clifton
Hi Patrice, Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and errors. In my opinion, it falls in the 'minor changes' case with respect to copyright. Thanks. I have applied your patch along with these changelog entries. Cheers Nick bfd/doc/ChangeLog 2013-01-07 Patri

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:34:26PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > HI Karl, hi all, > > I just came back from Paris, so I cannot provide more details now, > but it seems that binutils has a problem with the .92 pretest: From > the build error log (excerpt) > > > ../../../binutils/doc/binutils.te

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Patrice, > > > Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and > > errors. > > Core of the patch is >s/itemx/item/ > right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes. The patch handles errors/w

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Patrice, > Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and > errors. Core of the patch is s/itemx/item/ right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes. > Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Karl Berry
> ../../../binutils/doc/binutils.texi:4378: warning: @itemx should not begin @table > ../../../binutils/doc/binutils.texi:4386: @itemx must follow @item It's a real error in the Texinfo, that unfortunately C makeinfo did not diagnose. It needs to be reported to the binutils maintainers.

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Norbert Preining
HI Karl, hi all, I just came back from Paris, so I cannot provide more details now, but it seems that binutils has a problem with the .92 pretest: From the build error log (excerpt) > ../../../binutils/doc/binutils.texi:4378: warning: @itemx should not begin > @table > ../../../binutils/doc/binu

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Paul Wise
Source: binutils Version: 2.23.1-1~exp3 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org binutils 2.23.1-1~exp3 FTBFS with texinfo 4.13.92.dfsg.1-1 from experimental. There are some warnings that seem to cause the FTBFS: guest@morrison:~/cross$ apt-cache policy texinfo texinfo: