Hi,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 09:54:07PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
Thanks Jeremy for your good work on Ubuntu side. Now that freeze is
over and I have been working on this Ubuntu merge thing based on the new
1.5.3 package in Debian experimental. (This is not based on your posted
old patch. I did
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Aron Xu wrote:
> Integration isn't always a good thing, and it is good only when people
> have done it correctly. Ubuntu has not used the whole stack of GNOME
> for several cycles, and it shouldn't be an excuses that GNOME got the
> keyboard indicator work so the e
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 10 November 2012 21:20, Aron Xu wrote:
>> GNOME 3.6 can live with older version of ibus if you don't enable the
>> compile time integration, and currently the integration makes input
>> experience gets downgraded heavily, it's highly reco
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> GNOME 3.6 can live with older version of ibus if you don't enable the
> compile time integration, and currently the integration makes input
> experience gets downgraded heavily, it's highly recommended not to enable it
> at least for this cycle.
On 10 November 2012 21:20, Aron Xu wrote:
> GNOME 3.6 can live with older version of ibus if you don't enable the
> compile time integration, and currently the integration makes input
> experience gets downgraded heavily, it's highly recommended not to enable it
> at least for this cycle.
But the
On Nov 11, 2012 1:57 AM, "Jeremy Bicha" wrote
>
> GNOME 3.6 (which was released in September) only supports ibus
> 1.4.99+; therefore we must make the transition at the start of the
> Ubuntu 13.04 development cycle. Ubuntu developers like Seb Bacher
> expressed that requiring the latest ibus and g
Thanks for clarification for Ubuntu situation.
But I am not so convinced on your comment on symbols. I have read man
dpkg-gensymbol in detail :-) See below
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:53:50PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 10 November 2012 11:57, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Movimg old symbols
On 10 November 2012 11:57, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Movimg old symbols of different SONAME here may not be right solution.
> (I am new to this symbols thing so please tell me if I am wrong.)
>
> I thought debian/libibus-1.0-5.symbols should be more like attached.
> (I think to fix http://bugs.debian.or
Hi,
I found another problem with the patch for experimental while updating
unstable.
SONAME is now libibus-1.0.so.5 This is fine.
The proposed patch uses symbols file for
1.2.99.20100202 1.3.0 etc.which had soname libibus.so.2
but replacing it with libibus-1.0.so.5
1.3.99 and 1.4.0 and 1.4.1 s
On 6 November 2012 10:52, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> I think python-ibus needs to depend on ibus (or you could have things
>> like ibus-anthy explicitly depend on ibus instead).
>
> I disagree here.
>
> I do not understand your big picture idea. Please explain why you think
> "needs to depend on ibus".
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:56:10AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 6 November 2012 08:20, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >> Actually the original one is intentional to be like that, you may
> >> downgrade ibus-clutter to Suggests, but we need to have all the three
> >> other IM Modules in Recommends bec
On 6 November 2012 08:20, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> Actually the original one is intentional to be like that, you may
>> downgrade ibus-clutter to Suggests, but we need to have all the three
>> other IM Modules in Recommends because:
Ok.
> I agree with aron's analisys and I see no bugs here. If you
Hi Jeremy,
I have gone over your patch and there is a problem in it:
-Recommends: ibus-gtk3, ibus-gtk, ibus-qt4, ibus-clutter, im-config | im-switch
+Recommends: ibus-gtk3 | ibus-qt4 | ibus-clutter, ibus-gtk | ibus-qt4
| ibus-clutter, im-config | im-switch
Actually the original one is intentiona
0001-Merge-changes-from-Ubuntu-Closes-692424.patch
Description: Binary data
Package: ibus
Version: 1.4.99.20120917-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I'm attaching a patch with various fixes from Ubuntu.
Jeremy
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers raring-updates
APT policy: (500, 'raring-updates'), (500, 'raring-security'), (500,
'raring'), (5
15 matches
Mail list logo
