Hi,
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:12:10AM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Osamu,
>
> Le 01/11/2012 07:33, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:59:45PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> > ...
> >> Not even mentioning AsciiDoc sources, c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Osamu,
Le 01/11/2012 07:33, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:59:45PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> ...
>> Not even mentioning AsciiDoc sources, converted to DocBook, translated
>> for the DocBook version, etc. So in doubt, just le
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:59:45PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
...
> Not even mentioning AsciiDoc sources, converted to DocBook, translated
> for the DocBook version, etc. So in doubt, just let the maintainers take
> care of handling their bug reports ;).
Thanks.
I think I missed your last sv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 31/10/2012 16:03, Olivier Berger a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 01:41:02PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>> Why do you close a bug that is not fixed in the archive?
>
> Well, it seemed to me that it was fixed in the Web version,
It is fixed i
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 01:41:02PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>
> Le 31/10/2012 13:29, Olivier Berger a écrit :
> > close 691747
>
> Why do you close a bug that is not fixed in the archive?
>
Well, it seemed to me that it was fixed in the Web version, so I expected it to
be fixed in the archi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Olivier,
Le 31/10/2012 13:29, Olivier Berger a écrit :
> close 691747
Why do you close a bug that is not fixed in the archive?
Regards
David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkWKuAAoJELgqIXr9/g
6 matches
Mail list logo