On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 15.08.2012 12:24, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> []
>>> Yes, the boot code is missing from debian. This is a packaging error.
>>> Unfortunately no one noticed this before (it is b
On 15.08.2012 12:24, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>> Yes, the boot code is missing from debian. This is a packaging error.
>> Unfortunately no one noticed this before (it is broken since upstream
>> version 1.0), and unfortunately it needs
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> tags 684909 + confirmed
> retitle 684909 qemu-system-s390x is broken, no bootloader 's390-zipl.rom'
> thanks
>
> On 14.08.2012 19:42, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
>> It seems that qemu lack s390-zipl.rom. Trying to reproduce a s390 bug:
>>
>
tags 684909 + confirmed
retitle 684909 qemu-system-s390x is broken, no bootloader 's390-zipl.rom'
thanks
On 14.08.2012 19:42, bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> It seems that qemu lack s390-zipl.rom. Trying to reproduce a s390 bug:
>
> qemu-system-s390x [...]
> qemu: hardware error: could not load bootl
Package: qemu
Version: 1.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: important
It seems that qemu lack s390-zipl.rom. Trying to reproduce a s390 bug:
qemu-system-s390x -monitor stdio -net nic -net user -cdrom
debian-testing-s390-CD-1.iso -boot
order=d
qemu: hardware error: could not load bootloader 's390-zipl.rom'
C
5 matches
Mail list logo
