Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-04-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.04.2013 12:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 16:49 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 3/19/13 2:48 PM, Steve Singer wrote: > Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG 9.1 > support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures. > > The fixes fo

Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-04-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 16:49 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 3/19/13 2:48 PM, Steve Singer wrote: > > Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG 9.1 > > support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures. > > > > The fixes for PG 9.1 (upstream bugs #255) along wi

Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-25 Thread Steve Singer
Attached are two patches that should allow Slony 2.0.7 to work with PG 9.1 I've run slony with these patches through a number of runs of the clustertest suites and everything works as expected (lots of other bugs fixed in 2.1 and 2.2 are still present) Steve >From 57c307d52c08394d30f4c94374a6

Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 3/19/13 2:48 PM, Steve Singer wrote: > Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG 9.1 > support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures. > > The fixes for PG 9.1 (upstream bugs #255) along with the fixes for the > MOVE SET issue caused by the #255 fix (upstrea

Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-19 Thread Steve Singer
Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG 9.1 support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures. The fixes for PG 9.1 (upstream bugs #255) along with the fixes for the MOVE SET issue caused by the #255 fix (upstream bug #285) I think will produce a working slo

Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-19 Thread Neil McGovern
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org usertags 678979 wheezy-will-remove thanks On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:44:15PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Pete

Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-16 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead > > > upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgr

Bug#678979: request freeze exception for slony1-2

2013-03-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead > > upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgresql > > 9.1. Therefore, we had to resolve to making an upgrade to