On 13.04.2013 12:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 16:49 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 3/19/13 2:48 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
> Since the original bug was opened we've figured out why adding PG
9.1
> support to slony 2.0.x was causing occasional test failures.
>
> The fixes for PG 9.1 (upstream bugs #255) along with the fixes for
the
> MOVE SET issue caused by the #255 fix (upstream bug #285) I think
will
> produce a working slony 2.0.x against 9.1.
>
> If Debian would like I can assemble assemble these two patches and
run
> it through the testing suite.
Sure, if it's only two isolated patches that upstream is endorsing,
we
can give this a try.
Any news on that?
What's the status here?
We're getting very close to release now and if need be we'll have to
consider whether shipping the slony1-2 currently in wheezy is better or
worse than not shipping it at all.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
