Bug#677584: scanbuttond: patch for ScanScap not applied

2012-11-08 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "LZ" == Lei Zhang writes: LZ> IMO, if you are going to keep fujitsu.c, it's better to just LZ> replace to remove the scansnap backend altogether. It is just a LZ> duplicate of the epson backend. I can see some differences between the two backends, they don't look like duplica

Bug#677584: scanbuttond: patch for ScanScap not applied

2012-10-01 Thread Lei Zhang
I looked at the old patch and it was great because Javier did the hard work of rewriting the scansnap backend to work with the S1500. The only things he did incorrectly is leaving the Epson scanner USB IDs in the supported_usb_devices variable, and similary for the usb_device_descriptions variable

Bug#677584: scanbuttond: patch for ScanScap not applied

2012-06-15 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "NS" == Neil Schemenauer writes: NS> The patch I submitted (bug #614312) is included in the debian NS> control directory but doesn't appear to be applied to the source NS> tree before building. It doesn't appear in the 'series' file NS> and I think that's the cause. The pa

Bug#677584: scanbuttond: patch for ScanScap not applied

2012-06-14 Thread Neil Schemenauer
Package: scanbuttond Version: 0.2.3.cvs20090713-8 Severity: normal Hello, The patch I submitted (bug #614312) is included in the debian control directory but doesn't appear to be applied to the source tree before building. It doesn't appear in the 'series' file and I think that's the cause. Ide