Bug#668940: Patch: lzma not working

2012-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek
(OT: Very nice homepage you have there) On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Fusecompress was orphaned and is not in the archive anymore. You can take it up again as a new maintainer Before I seriously consider doing so: would you mind telling me why you dropped fusecompress? I'm u

Bug#668940: Patch: lzma not working

2012-04-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
There were bugs and upstream was not responsive. s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On Apr 16, 2012 2:54 AM, "Tomas Pospisek" wrote: > (OT: Very nice homepage you have there) > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Fusecompress was orphaned and is not in the archive anymore. You

Bug#668940: Patch: lzma not working

2012-04-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Fusecompress was orphaned and is not in the archive anymore. You can take it up again as a new maintainer On Apr 16, 2012 2:21 AM, "Tomas Pospisek" wrote: > Package: fusecompress > Version: 2.6-3.1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hello Ritesh et al, > > currently Debian's fusecompress won't

Bug#668940: Patch: lzma not working

2012-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Package: fusecompress Version: 2.6-3.1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello Ritesh et al, currently Debian's fusecompress won't compress files with lzma. To this effect, the changelog entry for version 2.6-2 contains the following note: "Drop liblzma-dev from Build Dependency since upstream hasn