Bug#664084: tkcvs: please split tkdiff in its own package

2012-03-16 Thread Tim Cutts
On 16 Mar 2012, at 16:55, Teodor MICU wrote: > 2012/3/16 Tim Cutts : >> It's perfectly possible to install the tkdiff package without tkcvs, or am I >> misunderstanding you? > > No, it has been removed from sid/testing [1]. This is why I sent this > bug report because I wanted to install it on

Bug#664084: tkcvs: please split tkdiff in its own package

2012-03-16 Thread Teodor MICU
2012/3/16 Tim Cutts : > It's perfectly possible to install the tkdiff package without tkcvs, or am I > misunderstanding you? No, it has been removed from sid/testing [1]. This is why I sent this bug report because I wanted to install it on my laptop (where I don't do CVS) and found that I had to

Bug#664084: tkcvs: please split tkdiff in its own package

2012-03-16 Thread Tim Cutts
On 15 Mar 2012, at 16:23, Teodor wrote: > Package: tkcvs > Version: 8.2.1-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > The 'tkdiff' tool is useful outside tkcvs too. Thus, it would be nice > to be able to install only 'tkdiff' if one doesn't use CVS. > Of course, tkcvs package would then depend on tkdiff

Bug#664084: tkcvs: please split tkdiff in its own package

2012-03-15 Thread Teodor
Package: tkcvs Version: 8.2.1-2 Severity: wishlist Hi, The 'tkdiff' tool is useful outside tkcvs too. Thus, it would be nice to be able to install only 'tkdiff' if one doesn't use CVS. Of course, tkcvs package would then depend on tkdiff. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/si