Bug#664041: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#664041: acpi-support: load cycles problem revisited

2012-03-23 Thread Igor Palmieri
If you allow me to suggest, I also think it´s best to ship it with hdparm package. The same logic explicited in README.distributions of pm-utils applies to acpi-support. Also, it would create again a dependency between acpi-support and hdparm just because of this script. Many thanks Igor On F

Bug#664041: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#664041: acpi-support: load cycles problem revisited

2012-03-23 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:46:03PM -0300, Igor Palmieri wrote: > - acpi-support (partially) solved #448673 by including 90-hdparm.sh hooks > by default at Debian and Ubuntu[1] > - The 90-hdparm-sh hooks were incorporated at Ubuntu´s pm-utils package, > which also makes hard drive apm working by de

Bug#664041: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#664041: acpi-support: load cycles problem revisited

2012-03-22 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:41:39AM -0300, Igor Palmieri wrote: > But, Debian´s acpi-support upstream is linked to Ubuntu´s package (as > seen in http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/acpi-support.html). Some time > later, Ubuntu´s own hdparm and pm-utils packages evolved to include a > chain of other scr

Bug#664041: acpi-support: load cycles problem revisited

2012-03-14 Thread Igor Palmieri
Package: acpi-support Version: 0.138-10 Severity: important Hi, Just did a fresh install of Debian Wheezy and noticed that the count of load cycles of my hard-drive are increasing constantly and at an undesired frequency. This issue is famous and was already reported five years ago as #448673 A