On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:46:03PM -0300, Igor Palmieri wrote: > - acpi-support (partially) solved #448673 by including 90-hdparm.sh hooks > by default at Debian and Ubuntu[1] > - The 90-hdparm-sh hooks were incorporated at Ubuntu´s pm-utils package, > which also makes hard drive apm working by default[2]. Couldn´t find if > Debian did this too. > - Debian and Ubuntu removed 90-hdparm.sh scripts from acpi-support because > of the redundancy with pm-utils[3] > - The hooks /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d/95hdparm-apm and > /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/95hdparm-apm were transferred to Ubuntu´s hdparm > package - that´s their current setting - and removed from pm-utils of > both[4] > > So Ubuntu still have the default hd apm setting, Debian not.
Thanks a lot for this explanation, exactly what I was looking for. Now the big question is, wouldn't it be better if we add the scripts to hdparm, too? They don't naturally belong to acpi-support IMO. Stephen, what do you think? I'm absolutely willing to help with the packaging work in hdparm if time constraints are a problem. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
