tags 655251 +wontfix
done
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:35:27PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> So these -dbg packages aren't detached debug symbols as is typical for
> packages so named. Ron and I talked about this a few months ago and
> concluded that it would be less confusing to rename them to someth
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:24:03PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:35:27PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> > As far as I can see, policy doesn't say that packages named -dbg have to
> > contain detached debug symbols, nor that library packages have to provide
> > detached debug sy
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:35:27PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> severity 655251 wishlist
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:51:21PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > With both -dbg packages installed, gdb still cannot provide any
> > sourceline information in backtraces.
> >
> > Looks like for som
severity 655251 wishlist
thanks
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:51:21PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> With both -dbg packages installed, gdb still cannot provide any
> sourceline information in backtraces.
>
> Looks like for some reason the provided files are shipped in
> /usr/lib/$ARCH with special nam
Package: libwxgtk2.8-dbg
Version: 2.8.12.1-6
Severity: important
With both -dbg packages installed, gdb still cannot provide any
sourceline information in backtraces.
Looks like for some reason the provided files are shipped in
/usr/lib/$ARCH with special names, instead of /usr/lib/$ARCH/debug
wi
5 matches
Mail list logo
