On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:> ...
> This was my point when I requested to move VTK to deb-sci umbrella, I>
> believe those two packages needs the same team of maintainer, and a> very
> close communication.>...
I think it is a good idea to maintain VTK and Paraview u
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> Really it boils down to two things:
>> - What is upstream position on this ? If upstream really do want to
>> release paraview on fixed schedule, with backward compati
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 10:22:36AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Really it boils down to two things:
> - What is upstream position on this ? If upstream really do want to
> release paraview on fixed schedule, with backward compatible code so
> that people can build paraview with the latest st
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> We already discussed it some months ago. From my point of view, it is
> not so simple...
Agreed
> At least the list of compiled vtk-libraries in vtk and paraview
> packages is not the same [1] and [2].
That's a totally different point.
Hi Dominique,
We already discussed it some months ago. From my point of view, it is
not so simple...
At least the list of compiled vtk-libraries in vtk and paraview
packages is not the same [1] and [2].
Also VTK and Paraview are not usually releasing at the same time (I
think, Mathieu noticed it
Package: paraview
Severity: serious
Please remove Paraview's VTK directory and link instead against
Debian's vtk libraries.
Thanks
-Dominique
6 matches
Mail list logo
